« Previous
Next »
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 71, Issue 2
, Pages 174-177
, February 1994
Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials
References
- . Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;25:299–306
- . Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;47:157–162
- . Comparison of two different methods of polishing porcelain. Scand J Dent Res. 1983;91:482–487
- . Surface finishing of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;46:217–221
- . Refinishing of porcelain by using a refinishing kit. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:383–388
- . Polished versus autoglazed porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:553–557
- . Profilometer, SEM and visual assessment of porcelain polishing methods. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:627–634
- . Effects of water, speed, and experimental instrumentation on finishing and polishing porcelain intraorally. Dent Mater. 1989;5:185–188
- . Polishing porcelain veneers: an SEM and specular reflectance analysis. Dent Mater. 1988;4:116–121
- . Efficacy of stones for polishing porcelain intraorally [Abstract]. J Dent Res. 1989;68:395
- . Effects of water, speed, and experimental instrumentation on finishing and polishing porcelain intraorally. Dent Mater. 1989;5:185–188
- . The surface roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic roughness of dental resin composites. J Dent Res. 1991;70:1299–1305
Supported by a Tylman Research Award from the American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics.
PII: 0022-3913(94)90027-2
© 1994 Published by Elsevier Inc.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 71, Issue 2
, Pages 174-177
, February 1994

