Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 83, Issue 2 , Pages 204-209 , February 2000

Fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements

Presented at the American Association for Dental Research Meeting, Orlando, Fla., 1997.

  • Lisa A. Knobloch, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Section of Restorative Dentistry, Prosthodontics, and Endodontics
  • ,
  • Ronald E. Kerby, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Section of Restorative Dentistry, Prosthodontics, and Endodontics
  • ,
  • Robert Seghi, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Section of Restorative Dentistry, Prosthodontics, and Endodontics
  • ,
  • Jeffrey S. Berlin

      Affiliations

    • Dental Student
  • ,
  • Jeffrey S. Lee

      Affiliations

    • Dental Student

References 

  1. Wise MD. Failure in the restored dentition: management and treatment. In: Chicago: Quintessence; 1995;p. 24-5–24-89
  2. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:280–301
  3. Mueller HJ. Fracture toughness and fractography of dental cements, lining, build-up, and filling materials. Scanning Microsc. 1990;4:297–307
  4. Kovarik RE, Fairhurst CW. Effect of Griffith precracks on measurement of composite fracture toughness. Dent Mater. 1993;9:222–228
  5. Kovarik RE, Ergle JW, Fairhurst CW. Effects of specimen geometry on the measurement of fracture toughness. Dent Mater. 1991;7:166–169
  6. Ferracane JL, Berge HX. Fracture toughness of experimental dental composites aged in ethanol. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1418–1423
  7. Roberts JC, Powers JM, Craig RG. Fracture toughness of composite and unfilled restorative resins. J Dent Res. 1977;56:748–753
  8. Truong VT, Tyas MJ. Prediction of in vivo wear in posterior composite resins: a fracture mechanics approach. Dent Mater. 1988;4:318–327
  9. Ferracane JL. Indentation fracture toughness testing and crack propagation mode in dental composites. Mater Res Symp Proc. 1989;110:619–624
  10. Lloyd CH, Adamson M. The development of fracture toughness and fracture strength in posterior restorative materials. Dent Mater. 1987;3:225–231
  11. Kim KH, Park JH, Imai Y, Kishi T. Microfracture mechanisms of dental resin composites containing spherically-shaped filler particles. J Dent Res. 1994;73:499–504
  12. Fujishima A, Ferracane JL. Comparison of four modes of fracture toughness testing for dental composites. Dent Mater. 1996;12:38–43
  13. Ferracane JL, Antonio RC, Matsumoto H. Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1140–1145
  14. Uctasli S, Harrington E, Wilson HJ. The fracture resistance of dental materials. J Oral Rehab. 1995;22:877–886
  15. O’Brien WJ. Dental materials: properties and selection. In: Chicago: Quintessence; 1989;p. 215
  16. White SN, Yu Z. Physical properties of fixed prosthodontic, resin composite luting agents. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6:384–389
  17. Paddon JM, Wilson AD. Stress relaxation studies on dental materials. I, Dental Cements. J Dent Res. 1976;4:183–189
  18. McLean JW. The future of restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42:154–158
  19. Johnson WW, Dhuru VB, Brantley WA. Composite microfiller content and its effect on fracture toughness and diametral tensile strength. Dent Mater. 1993;9:95–98
  20. Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with an adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:11–20
  21. Yoshida K, Tanagawa M, Atsuta M. In-vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements. J Oral Rehab. 1998;25:285–291
  22. Ruyter IE. Monomer systems and polymerizations. In:  Vanherle G,  Smith DC editor. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Peter Szulc Co; 1985;p. 109–135
  23. Cook WD, Mahendra M. Influence of chemical structure on the fracture behavior of dimethacrylate composite resins. Biomaterials. 1990;11:272–276
  24. Pilliar RM, Vowles R, Williams DF. The effect of environmental aging on the fracture toughness of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1987;66:722–726
  25. Lloyd CH, Iannetta RV. The fracture toughness of dental composites. I. The development of strength and fracture toughness. J Oral Rehab. 1982;9:55–66
  26. Young RJ, Beaumont PW. Failure of brittle polymers by slow crack growth; III. Effect of composition upon the fracture of silica particle-filled epoxy resin composites. J Mater Sci. 1977;12:684–693
  27. Lange FF. The interaction of a crack front with a second phase dispersion. Phil Mag. 1970;22:983–992
  28. Fu Y, Evans AG. Some effects of microcracks on the mechanical properties of brittle solid. Acta Metall. 1985;33:1515–1523
  29. Lange FF, Radford KC. Fracture energy of an epoxy composite system. J Mater Sci. 1971;6:1197–1203
  30. Goldman M. Fracture properties of composite and glass-ionomer dental restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1985;19:771–783
  31. Mathis RS, Ferracane JL. Properties of a glass-ionomer/resin-composite hybrid material. Dent Mater. 1989;5:355–358
  32. Wilson AD, Hill RG, Warrens CP, Lewis BG. The influence of polyacid molecular weight on some properties of glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res. 1989;68:89–94
  33. McLean JW, Wilson AD. The clinical development of the glass ionomer cement. III. The erosion lesion. Aust Dent J. 1977;22:190–195
  34. Finger W. Evaluation of glass ionomer luting cements. Scand J Dent Res. 1983;91:143–149
  35. Canay S, Hersek N, Akca K, Ciftci Y. The effect of weight loss of liquid on the diametral tensile strengths of various kinds of luting cements. Int Dent J. 1996;46:52–56
  36. Brackett WW, Metz JE. Performance of a glass ionomer luting cement over 5 years in a general practice. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:59–61
  37. Metz JE, Brackett WW. Performance of a glass ionomer luting cement over 8 years in a general practice. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:13–15
  38. Wu JC, Wilson PR. Resin luting cements for full coverage restorations. Aust Prosthod J. 1994;8:55–63
  39. Kovarik RE, Muncy MV. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent. 1995;8:145–148
  40. ASTM Standard E-399-83. Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. In: 1992 Annual book of ASTM standards.. Philadelphia: ASTM; 1992;p. 676–706
  41. Welsch RE. Stepwise multiple comparison procedures. J Am Stat Assoc. 1977;72:566–775

 Supported by The Ohio State University College of Dentistry.

☆☆ Reprint requests to: DR LISA A. KNOBLOCH, DEPARTMENT OF RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, PROSTHODONTICS, AND ENDODONTICS, COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY, THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, 305 W 12TH AVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43210, FAX: (614) 292-9422, E-MAIL: knobloch.3@osu.edu

 0022-3913/2000/$12.00 + 0. 10/1/104368

PII: S0022-3913(00)70112-0

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 83, Issue 2 , Pages 204-209 , February 2000