Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 83, Issue 3 , Pages 306-313 , March 2000

Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies

  • Richard B. Price, BDS, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences
    • ,
  • Jack D. Gerrow, DDS, MS, MEd

      Affiliations

    • Acting Chair, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences

References 

  1. Reis-Schmidt T. Trends in dentistry. Dent Prod Rep. 1998;4:33–39
  2. In:  Albers HF editors. Indirect composites. Santa Rosa (CA): Adept Report; 1998;p. 1
  3. Burke FJ, Watts DC, Wilson NH, Wilson MA. Current status and rationale for composite inlays and onlays. Br Dent J. 1991;170:269–273
  4. Donly KJ. Composite resin inlays: a single appointment technique. Am J Dent. 1990;3:181–184
  5. Bessing C, Lundqvist P. A 1-year clinical examination of indirect composite resin inlays: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:153–157
  6. Dickerson WG. Indirect resin restoration—a proper technique to ensure success. Compendium. 1993;14:216–224
  7. Shannon A. Clinical guidelines for indirect resin restorations. J Can Dent Assoc. 1997;63:432–437
  8. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The restoration of posterior teeth with composite resin. 2: indirect-placement composite. Dent Update. 1997;24:25–30
  9. Watson MT. Trends in dentistry. Dent Prod Rep. 1999;12:26
  10. Plasmans PJ, van’t Hof MA, Creugers NH. Fabrication times for indirect composite resin restorations. J Dent. 1992;20:27–32
  11. Douglas WH, Fields RP, Fundingsland J. A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. J Dent. 1989;17:184–188
  12. Llena Puy MC, Navarro LF, Faus Llacer VJ, Ferrandez A. Composite inlays: a study of marginal adaptation. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:429–433
  13. Wilson MA, Norman RD. An investigation into the incidence of voids in indirect composite inlays formed using different packing techniques. J Dent. 1991;19:296–300
  14. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results. Am J Dent. 1992;5:258–262
  15. Park SH. Comparison of degree of conversion for light-cured and additionally heat-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:613–618
  16. Oram DA, Pearson GJ. A survey of current practice into the use of aesthetic inlays. Br Dent J. 1994;176:457–462
  17. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Oper Dent. 1990;15:129–135
  18. Mitchem JC, Wagner PC, Ferracane JL. Marginal adaptation of the Concept inlay system. Am J Dent. 1994;7:232–234
  19. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Baidas KM. Marginal fit and microleakage of indirect inlay systems. Am J Dent. 1993;6:81–84
  20. Reeves GW, Lentz DL, O’Hara JW, McDaniel MD, Tolbert WE. Comparison of marginal adaptation between direct and indirect composites. Oper Dent. 1992;17:210–214
  21. Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, Gruythuysen RJ. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin composite inlays. ASDC J Dent Child. 1994;61:29–34
  22. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al.  Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent. 1995;23:329–338
  23. Krejci I, Güntert A, Lutz F. Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:403–409
  24. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays. Scand J Dent Res. 1994;102:186–192
  25. van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays. J Dent. 1996;24:389–394
  26. O’Neal SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993;124:48–54
  27. Leinfelder KF, Isenberg BP, Essig ME. A new method for generating ceramic restorations: a CAD-CAM system. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;118:703–707
  28. Noack MJ, DeGee AJ, Roulet JF, et al.  Interfacial wear of luting composites of ceramic inlays in vitro. J Dent Res. 1992;71:113; (abstract 58)
  29. Christensen GJ. A look at state-of-the-art tooth-colored inlays and onlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992;123:66–67
  30. Milleding P. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct technique. Acta Odontol Scand. 1992;50:295–301
  31. Robinson PB, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent. 1987;12:113–116
  32. Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Baylis MA, Grundy JR. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. Int J Prosthodont. 1989;2:217–223
  33. Liberman R, Ben Amar A, Herteanu L, Judes H. Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:26–29
  34. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. Dent Mater. 1989;5:388–391
  35. Cassin AM, Pearson GJ. Microleakage studies comparing a one-visit indirect composite inlay system and a direct composite restorative technique. J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19:265–270
  36. Roberts DB. Flexible casts used in making indirect interim restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:372–374
  37. Moulding MB, Loney RW, Ritsco RG. Marginal accuracy of indirect provisional restorations fabricated on poly (vinyl siloxane) models. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7:554–558
  38. Rada RE. In-office fabrication of indirect composite-resin restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1992;4:25–29
  39. Liebenberg WH. Direct-indirect resin restoration: a case report of acceptable compromise. J Can Dent Assoc. 1997;63:265–272
  40. Settembrini L, Gultz G, Scherer W, Kaim J. A 30-minute in-office indirect composite inlay technique. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:366–367
  41. Trushkowsky RD. One visit composite onlay utilizing a new flexible model material. Am J Dent. 1997;10:55–56
  42. Carlyle LW. Compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials with dental stones. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:434–437
  43. Gerrow JD, Schneider RL. A comparison of the compatibility of elastomeric impression materials, type IV dental stones, and liquid media. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:292–298
  44. Schelb E, Mazzocco CV, Jones JD, Prihoda T. Compatibility of type IV dental stones with polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:19–22
  45. Schelb E, Baracat SA, Almaguer R. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials. Am J Dent. 1990;3:171–174
  46. Gerrow JD, Price RB. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:485–489
  47. Hinoura K, Aoshima Y, Iwano K, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of die material hue and value on polymerization of indirect resin inlays. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6:255–258

☆ This study was partially supported by Kerr Manufacturing Co.

☆☆ Reprint requests to: Dr Richard Price, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, b3h 3j5, Canada, FAX: (902)494-1662, E-MAIL: rbprice@is.dal.ca

PII: S0022-3913(00)70133-8

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 83, Issue 3 , Pages 306-313 , March 2000

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution