Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 86, Issue 2 , Pages 149-155 , August 2001

In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications

References 

  1. Nayyar A, Walton RE, Leonard LA. An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel and core technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:511–515
  2. Hoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;47:177–181
  3. Perel ML, Muroff FI. Clinical criteria for posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;28:405–411
  4. Stahl GH, O'Neal RB. The composite resin dowel and core. J Prosthet Dent. 1975;33:642–648
  5. McLean JW, Gasser O. Glass-cermet cements. Quintessence Int. 1985;16:333–343
  6. Swift EJ, Pawlus MA, Vargas MA, Fortin D. Depth of cure of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dent Mater. 1995;11:196–200
  7. Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cements. In: Chicago (IL): Quintessence; 1988;p. 60–68
  8. Osborne JW, Albino JE. Psychological and medical effects of mercury intake from dental amalgam. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1999;12:151–156
  9. Schuurs AH. Reproductive toxicity of occupational mercury. A review of the literature. J Dent. 1999;27:249–256
  10. Nakajima H, Wataha JC, Rockwell LC, Okabe T. In vitro cytotoxicity of amalgams made with binary Hg-In liquid alloys. Dent Mater. 1997;13:168–173
  11. Skare I, Engqvist A. Human exposure to mercury and silver released from dental amalgam restorations. Arch Environ Health. 1994;49:384–394
  12. Bratel J, Haraldson T, Meding B, Yontchev E, Ohman SC, Ottosson JO. Potential side effects of dental amalgam restorations. I. An oral and medical investigation. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:234–243
  13. Bratel J, Haraldson T, Ottosson JO. Potential side effects of dental amalgam restorations. II. No relation between mercury levels in the body and mental disorders. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:244–250
  14. Holmgren CJ, Frencken JE. Painting the future for ART. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999;27:449–453
  15. Mjor IA, Gordan VV. A review of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). Int Dent J. 1999;49:127–131
  16. Vaikuntam J. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry. ASDC J Dent Child. 1997;64:131–134
  17. Christensen CJ. Restoration of pediatric posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:106–108
  18. Millstein PL, Ho J, Nathanson D. Retention between a serrated steel dowel and different core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:480–482
  19. Taleghani M, Leinfielder KF. Evaluation of a new glass ionomer cement with silver as a core buildup under a cast restoration. Quintessence Int. 1988;19:19–24
  20. Arcoria CJ, DeWald JP, Moody CR, Ferracane JL. A comparative study of the bond strengths of amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores. J Oral Rehabil. 1989;16:301–307
  21. Cohen BI, Deutsch AS, Condos S, Musikant BL, Scherer W. Compressive and diametral tensile strength of titanium-reinforced composites. J Esthetic Dent. 1992;4(Suppl):50–55
  22. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1997;76:883–894
  23. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Longevity in glass-ionomer restorations: review of a successful technique. Quintessence Int. 1997;78:643–1640
  24. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Micro magnetic resonance imaging of water uptake by glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 1997;78:20–23
  25. Gateau P, Sabek M, Dailey B. Fatigue testing and microscipic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:341–347
  26. Kovarik RE, Breedings LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:584–590
  27. Carter JM, Sorensen SE, Johnson RR, Teitelbaum RL, Levine MS. Punch shear testing of extracted vital and endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech. 1983;16:841–848
  28. Strawn SE, White JM, Marshall GW, Gee L, Goodis HE, Marshall SJ. Spectroscopic changes in human dentine exposed to various storage solutions—short term. J Dent. 1996;24:417–423
  29. Mollersten L. Machinability of some dentin simulating materials. Swed Dent J. 1985;9:219–224
  30. Waltimo A, Kononen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res. 1993;101:171–175
  31. Braun S, Hnat WP, Freudenthaler JW, Marcotte MR, Honigle K, Johnson BE. A study of maximum bite force during growth and development. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:261–264
  32. Lundeen H, Gibbs HC. Advances in occlusion. In: Bristol: J Wright; 1982;p. 22
  33. Bakke M, Holm B, Jensen BL, Michler L, Moller E. Unilateral, isometric bite force in 8-68-year-old women and men related to occlusal factors. Scan J Dent Res. 1990;98:149–158
  34. Huysmans MC, van der Varst PG. Mechanical longevity estimation model for post-and-core restorations. Dent Mater. 1995;11:252–257
  35. Rupert G, Miller Jr, McGraw H. Simultaneous statistical inference. In: London: McGraw-Hill; 1996;p. 165–172
  36. Hunt PR, Gogarnoiu D. Evolution of post and core systems. J Esthet Dent. 1996;8:74–83
  37. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:203–209

☆ aAssistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics.

☆☆ bConsultant, Department of Prosthodontics.

★ cConsultant, Department of Prosthodontics.

★★ Reprint requests to: Dr Philippe Gateau, 17ter rue Achille Millien, 58000 Nevers, FRANCE, Fax: (33)386-570-652, E-mail: philippe.gateau2@wanadoo.fr

PII: S0022-3913(01)82491-4

doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114882

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 86, Issue 2 , Pages 149-155 , August 2001

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution