Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 21-25, July 2002

Prospective clinical trial of dental implants in persons with ectodermal dysplasia☆☆★★♢♢

Presented at the 28th annual meeting of the American Association of Dental Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, March 1999. Supported by the National Institute of Dental Research Intramural Research Program.

School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.; Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa.; and National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Abstract 

Statement of Problem. Ectodermal dysplasia is a hereditary condition in which hypodontia is the second most frequently occurring sign. Hypodontia is associated with lack of development of the alveolar ridge and results in less volume of bone for support of conventional prostheses. Minimal development of the alveolar ridge can affect the bone volume available for the placement of dental implants. Purpose. This clinical trial evaluated the survival of implants placed in individuals with a form of ectodermal dysplasia and severe hypodontia. Material and Methods. Two hundred sixty-four titanium endosteal dental implants were placed in 51 subjects: 37 males and 14 females between the ages of 8 and 68 (mean age 20.5 years, median age 16.5 years). Two hundred forty-three implants were placed in the anterior mandible, and 21 were placed in the anterior maxilla with a 2-stage surgical protocol. Either fixed-detachable dentures or bar-clip overdentures were provided. Subjects were followed up for 0 to 78 months after second-stage surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival rates and curves were produced to describe the survival of the implants for the different age groups and implant locations. Repeated-measures Cox regression models were used to evaluate the hazard ratios for age and location, with α=.05 as the criteria for significance. Results. Of the 243 implants placed in the anterior mandible, 221 (91%) survived. Of the 21 implants placed in the anterior maxilla, 16 (76%) survived. Fourteen of the 51 (27%) subjects had a failed implant. All but 2 failures occurred before or at second-stage surgery. Implant-supported prostheses were provided for all patients. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, the results support the continued use of endosteal dental implants in this patient population with appropriate precautions in the maxilla. (J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:21-5.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 aAssociate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, UNC School of Dentistry.

☆☆ bFormer Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, UNC School of Dentistry.

 cAssistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa.

★★ dChief, Commissioned Officers Dental Clinic, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

 eStaff Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, Bethesda, Md.

♢♢ Reprint requests to: Dr Albert D. Guckes, Room 300A, Brauer Hall, CB 7450, UNC School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, Fax: (919)966-3821 E-mail: ad_guckes@dentistry.unc.edu

PII: S0022-3913(02)00043-4

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(02)00043-4

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 21-25, July 2002