Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 26-31 , July 2002

Delayed linear expansion of improved dental stone

References 

  1. Bailey JH, Donovan TE, Preston JD. The dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone silverplated, and epoxy resin die materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:307–310
  2. American National Standards/American Dental Association . Specification 25 for dental gypsum products. In: New York: : American National Standards Institute; 2000;p. 244–253
  3. Mahler DB, Andy AB. Explanation for the hygroscopic setting expansion of dental gypsum products. J Dent Res. 1960;39:578–582
  4. Aiach D, Malone WF, Sandrik J. Dimensional accuracy of epoxy resins and their compatibility with impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:500–504
  5. Anusavice KJ. Phillip's science of dental materials. In: 10th ed. Philadelphia: : WB Saunders; 1996;p. 185–208
  6. Peyton FA, Liebold JP, Ridgley GV. Surface hardness, compressive strength, and abrasion resistance of indirect die stones. J Prosthet Dent. 1952;2:381–389
  7. International Standards Organization (ISO) . International Standard 6873, dental gypsum products. Geneva: : International Organization for Standardization; 1998;
  8. Newman A, Williams JD. Die materials for inlay, crown and bridge work. Br Dent J. 1969;127:415–420
  9. Winkler MM, Monaghan P, Gilbert JL, Lautenschlager EP. Comparison of four techniques for monitoring the setting kinetics of gypsum. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:532–536
  10. Fernandes CP, Vassilakos N. Accuracy, detail reproduction, and hardness of gypsum casts produced from silicon impressions treated with glow discharge. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:457–464
  11. Dilts W, Podshadley A, Ellison E, Neiman R. Accuracy of a removable die-dowel pin technique. J Dent Res. 1971;50:1249–1252
  12. Schnieder RL, Taylor TD. Compressive strength and surface hardness of type IV die stone when mixed with water substitutes. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:510–514
  13. Dilts WE, Podshadley AG, Sawyer HF, Neiman R. Accuracy of four removable die techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 1971;83:1081–1085
  14. Buchman AS, Worner HK. Changes in the composition and setting characteristics of plaster of Paris on exposure to high humidity atmospheres. J Dent Res. 1945;24:65–74
  15. Combe EC, Smith DC. Studies on the preparation of calcium sulfate hemihydrate by an autoclave process. J App Chem. 1968;18:307–312
  16. Cohen J. New die materials in dentistry. J Mich Dent Assoc. 1962;44:9–13
  17. McCabe JF. Applied dental materials. In: 7th ed. London: : Martin Book Service Ltd; 1990;p. 28–31
  18. Hoggat G. Method of producing gypsum plaster. US Patent. 1933;3:190105
  19. Earnhurst R, Marks BI. The measurement of the setting time of gypsum products. Aust Dent J. 1964;9:17–26
  20. Budnikov P. Activating and retarding agents for the setting of plaster of Paris. Kolloid Z. 1928;44:242–249
  21. Chaffee NR, Bailey JH, Sherrard DJ. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part I: Single die. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:131–135
  22. Yli-Urpo A, Oilo G, Syverud M. The effect of asbestos-alternatives on the accuracy of cast veneer crowns. Swed Dent J. 1982;6:127–131
  23. Derrien G, Le Menn G. Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:1–7
  24. Schwedhelm ER, Lepe X. Fracture strength of type IV and type V die stone as a function of time. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:554–559
  25. Gerrow JD, Price RB. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:485–489
  26. Alsadi S, Combe EC, Cheng YS. Properties of gypsum with the addition of gum arabic and calcium hydroxide. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:530–534
  27. Derrien G, Sturtz G. Comparison of transverse strength and dimensional variations between die stone, die epoxy resin, and die polyurethane resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:569–574
  28. Chaffee NR, Bailey JH, Sherrard DJ. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part II: Complete arch form. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:235–238

☆ This research was supported by a 1998 Tylman Research Grant and also received the first place Tylman competition award at the 49th annual scientific session of the American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics, February 2000, Chicago, Ill. A poster abstract (no. 470) of the pilot research was presented at the 27th annual meeting of the American Association for Dental Research, March 1998, Minneapolis, Minn.

☆☆ aAssistant Professor, Department of Restorative, Prosthodontics, and Endodontics, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry.

★ bAssociate Professor and Director, Graduate Prosthodontics, Marquette University School of Dentistry.

★★ cAdjunct Associate Professor, Division of Prosthodontics, Marquette University School of Dentistry.

♢ dAssociate Professor (retired), Division of Dental Biomaterials, Marquette University School of Dentistry.

♢♢ Reprint requests to: Dr William W. Nagy, Marquette University School of Dentistry 334, PO Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881, Fax: (414)288-6516, E-mail: william.nagy@marquette.edu

PII: S0022-3913(02)00044-6

doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(02)00044-6

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 26-31 , July 2002

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution