Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 50-53, July 2002

Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity☆☆★★♢♢

College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, Neb

Abstract 

Statement of Problem. Postoperative cold sensitivity after the cementation of indirect restorations with composite cements has been reported frequently but not scientifically documented. Purpose. This controlled clinical study was designed to simulate the dentin/composite cement interface immediately after cementation of a cast restoration. The desensitizing capabilities of a composite cement that contains a self-etching, dual-polymerizing resin adhesive system were compared with those of a composite cement that use phosphoric acid etching followed by a single-bottle, light-activated primer/resin-based adhesive. Material and Methods. The hypersensitive root surfaces of selected teeth were randomized to receive 1 of 3 treatments: coating with a self-etching adhesive (Linkmax) and its respective cement, coating with a conventionally etched adhesive (RelyX ARC) and its cement, or no treatment (negative control). The sample size was 22. Dentin sensitivity was ascertained with an accurate cold testing device that slowly decreased in temperature. Tooth sensitivity was measured both immediately and at 7 days after placement. Two-way analysis of variance and Fisher's least significant difference test (P<.05) were used to determine whether significant differences existed as a function of treatment type or time. Results. Immediately after placement, the self-etching adhesive and its respective cement resulted in more suppression of cold sensitivity than no treatment (control); with Linkmax treatment, the temperature at which teeth responded was reduced by 8.4°C. The conventionally etched adhesive and its cement reduced the temperature at which teeth responded by 9.4°C. After 1 week, these temperature reductions were 7.0°C and 4.3°C, respectively. Untreated controls at the 2 intervals showed a mean decrease in sensitivity to cold of 3.6°C and 4.1°C. Statistical analysis showed type of composite cement to be a significant factor. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study and in comparison to untreated control teeth, Linkmax treatment resulted in a significant reduction in tooth root sensitivity over 1 week (P=.02), whereas RelyX ARC did not (P=.066). (J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:50-3.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 aAssistant Professor, Department of Dental Hygiene.

☆☆ bAssociate Professor and Director, Section of Operative Dentistry, Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry.

 cDepartment of Surgical Specialties.

★★ dAssociate Professor and Director, Section of Biomaterials, Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry.

 This study was supported by a grant from GC America, Inc.

♢♢ Reprint requests to: Michelle L. Sensat, UNMC College OF Dentistry, Room 106, 40th and Holdrege, PO Box 830740, Lincoln, NE 68583-0740, Fax: (402)472-1956, E-mail: msensat@unmc.edu

PII: S0022-3913(02)00048-3

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(02)00048-3

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 50-53, July 2002