Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 50-53 , July 2002

Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity

References 

  1. Kern M, Kleimeier B, Schaller HG, Strub JR. Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:159–162
  2. Metz JE, Brackett WW. Performance of a glass ionomer luting cement over 8 years in a general practice. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:13–15
  3. Christensen GJ. Resin cements and postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:1197–1199
  4. Ling TY, Gillam DG. The effectiveness of desensitizing agents for the treatment of cervical dentine sensitivity (CDS)—a review. J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr. 1996;44:5–12
  5. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentin. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:280–284
  6. Pashley DH. Strategies for clinical evaluation of drugs and/or devices for the alleviation of hypersensitive dentin. In:  Rowe NH editors. Proceedings of symposium on hypersensitive dentin. Origin and management. Ann Arbor (MI): : University of Michigan; 1985;p. 65–88
  7. Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod. 1986;12:453–457
  8. Pashley D. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endod. 1986;12:465–474
  9. Davidson DF, Suzuki M. The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin. J Can Dent Assoc. 1997;63:38–41
  10. Dondi dall'Orologio G, Lorenzi R, Anselmi M, Opisso V. Dentin desensitizing effects of Gluma Alternate, Health-Dent Desensitizer and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent. 1999;12:103–106
  11. Calamia JR, Styner DL, Rattet AH. Effect of Amalgambond on cervical sensitivity. Am J Dent. 1995;8:283–284
  12. Davidson DF, Suzuki M. The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin. J Can Dent Assoc. 1997;63:38–41
  13. Wat P, Cheung GS. Incidence of post-operative sensitivity following indirect porcelain onlay restorations: preliminary results. Asian J Aesthet Dent. 1995;3:3–7
  14. Kennington LB, Davis RD, Murchison DF, Langenderfer WR. Short-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent. 1998;11:177–180
  15. Felton DA, Bergenholtz G, Kanoy BE. Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4:292–298
  16. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots. Am J Dent. 1999;12:243–249
  17. Walline BW, Wagner JG, Marx DB, Reinhardt RA. Comparison of methods for measuring root and mucogingival sensitivity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:641–646

☆ aAssistant Professor, Department of Dental Hygiene.

☆☆ bAssociate Professor and Director, Section of Operative Dentistry, Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry.

★ cDepartment of Surgical Specialties.

★★ dAssociate Professor and Director, Section of Biomaterials, Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry.

♢ This study was supported by a grant from GC America, Inc.

♢♢ Reprint requests to: Michelle L. Sensat, UNMC College OF Dentistry, Room 106, 40th and Holdrege, PO Box 830740, Lincoln, NE 68583-0740, Fax: (402)472-1956, E-mail: msensat@unmc.edu

PII: S0022-3913(02)00048-3

doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(02)00048-3

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 50-53 , July 2002

Article Tools