Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 367-374 , October 2002

Resistance of core materials against torsional forces on differently conditioned titanium posts

Presented at 27th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Dental Research, Minneapolis, Minn., March 1998.

References 

  1. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effect of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:400–405
  2. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Holcomb J, Trabert KC. The retentive and stress-distributing properties of a threaded endodontic dowel. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;44:398–404
  3. Oliva RA, Lowe JA. Dimensional stability of composite used as a core material. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56:554–561
  4. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:584–590
  5. Chang WC, Millstein PL. Effect of design of prefabricated post heads on core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:475–482
  6. Cohen BI, Condos S, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7:178–182
  7. Huysmans MC, van der Varst PG. Mechanical longevity estimation model for post-and-core restorations. Dent Mater. 1995;11:252–257
  8. Zardiackas LD, Disegi J, Givan D. Torsional properties of implant grade titanium. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:281–293
  9. Christensen GJ. Posts: necessary or unnecessary?. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:1522–1526
  10. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:780–784
  11. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:28–35
  12. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent. 2001;29:427–433
  13. Strub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:120–124
  14. Chan RW, Bryant RW. Post-core foundations for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48:401–406
  15. Hoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation for three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;47:177–181
  16. Linde LA. The use of composites as core material in root filled teeth. I. In vitro study. Swed Dent J. 1983;7:205–214
  17. Nayar A. Coronal-radicular buildup for endodontically treated teeth. In:  Clark JW editors. Clinical dentistry. Volume 4:Philadelphia: : Harper & Row; 1983;p. 1–28
  18. Chapman KW, Worley JL, von Fraunhofer JA. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:649–652
  19. Plasmans PJ, Visseren LG, Vrijhoef MM, Kayser AF. In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. J Endod. 1986;12:382–387
  20. Brandal JL, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. A comparison of three restorative techniques for endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:161–165
  21. Marshak BL, Ben Shemen B, Cardash HS. Use of a special matrix system for constructing amalgam and composite cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:21–22
  22. Taleghani M, Morgan RW. Reconstructive materials for endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:446–449
  23. Attin T, Buchalla W, Kielbassa AM, Helwig E. Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater. 1995;11:359–362
  24. Engelman MJ. Core materials. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1988;16:41–45
  25. Lepe X, Bales DJ, Johnson GH. Tensile dislodgment evaluation of two experimental prefabricated post systems. Oper Dent. 1996;21:209–212
  26. Burgess JO, Summit JB, Robbins JW. The resistance to tensile, compression, and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:899–903
  27. Cohen BI, Condos S, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retentive properties of threaded split-shaft posts with titanium-reinforced composite cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:910–912
  28. Levartovsky S, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M. Shear bond strength of several new core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:154–158
  29. Stockton LW, Williams PT. Retention and shear bond strength of two post systems. Oper Dent. 1999;24:210–216
  30. Stockton LW, Williams PT, Clarke CT. Post retention and post/core shear bond strength of four post systems. Oper Dent. 2000;25:441–447
  31. Wadhwani CP. A single visit, multidisciplinary approach to the management of traumatic tooth crown fracture. Br Dent J. 2000;188:593–598
  32. Huysmans MC, van der Varst PG, Schafer R, Peters MC, Plasschaert AJ, Soltesz U. Fatigue behavior of direct post-and-core-restored premolars. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1145–1150
  33. Hemmings KW, King PA, Setchell DJ. Resistance to torsional forces of various post and core designs. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:325–329
  34. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the torsional forces at failure for seven endodontic post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:350–357
  35. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Effects of three bonding systems on the torsional resistance of titanium-reinforced composite cores supported by two post designs. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:678–683
  36. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS, Cofrancesco G. Pilot study of the effects of three bonding systems on the torsional resistance of a titanium-reinforced composite core. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:277–280
  37. Cohen BI, Penugonda B, Pagnillo MK, Schulman A, Hittelman E. Torsional resistance of crowns cemented to composite cores involving three stainless steel endodontic post designs. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:38–42
  38. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Silicoating: evaluation of a new method of bonding composite resin to metal. Scand J Dent Res. 1988;96:171–176
  39. Vojvodic D, Predanic-Gasparac H, Brkic H, Celebic A. The bond strength of polymers and metal surfaces using the ‘silicoater’ technique. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:493–499
  40. Ozcan M, Pfeiffer P, Nergiz I. A brief history and current status of metal- and ceramic surface-conditioning concepts for resin bonding in dentistry. Quintessence Int. 1998;29:713–724
  41. Moulin P, Degrange M, Picard B. Influence of surface treatment on adherence energy of alloys used in bonded prosthetics. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:413–421
  42. Mazurat RD, Pesun S. Resin-metal bonding systems: a review of the Silicoating and Kevloc systems. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998;64:503–507
  43. Pesun S, Mazurat RD. Bond strength of acrylic resin to cobalt-chromium alloy treated with the Silicoater MD and Kevloc systems. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998;64:798–802
  44. Vojvodic D, Jerolimov V, Celebic A, Catovic A. Bond strengths of silicoated and acrylic resin bonding systems to metal. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:1–6
  45. Watanabe I, Kurtz KS, Kabcenell JL, Okabe T. Effect of sandblasting and silicoating on bond strength of polymer-glass composite to cast titanium. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:462–467
  46. Soderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1248–1254
  47. Moulin P, Picard B, Degrange M. Water resistance of resin-bonded joints with time related to alloy surface treatment. J Dent. 1999;27:79–87
  48. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Matsumoto N. Influence of thermal cycles in water on flexural strength of laboratory-processed composite resin. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:703–707
  49. Magneville B, Dejou J. A comparison of two methods of adhering composite to metal. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:97–101
  50. Kourtis SG. Bond strengths of resin-to-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:136–145
  51. Mukai M, Fukui H, Hasegawa J. Relationship between sandblasting and composite resin-alloy bond strength by a silica coating. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:151–155
  52. Stoknorm R, Isidor F, Ravnholt G. Tensile bond strength of resin luting cement to a porcelain-fusing noble alloy. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:323–330
  53. Na Badalung DP, Powers JM, Connelly ME. Comparison of bond strengths of denture base resins to nickel-chromium-beryllium removable partial denture alloy. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:566–573
  54. Hansson O. Strength of bond with Comspan Opaque to three silicoated alloys and titanium. Scand J Dent Res. 1990;98:248–256
  55. May KB, Fox J, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Silane to enhance the bond between polymethyl methacrylate and titanium. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:428–431
  56. Titan Chemische Zusammensetzung (Titanium; chemical composition). Berlin: : Deutsches Institut Für Normung eV (DIN); 1990; DIN 17850
  57. International Organization for Standardization . Dentistry—polymer-based crown and bridge materials. Amendment 1996; ISO 10477. Geneva, Switzerland: : International Organization for Standardization; 1996;
  58. Kern M, Thompson VP. Durability of resin bonds to pure titanium. J Prosthodont. 1995;4:16–22

☆ Reprint requests to: Dr Mutlu Özcan, Universitair Docent, University of Groningen, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, Oral Health Institute, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, THE NETHERLANDS, Fax: +31-50-363-2696, E-mail: mutluozcan@hotmail.com

☆☆ aResearch Assistant, Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Hamburg.

★ bAssistant Professor, Department of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University of Groningen.

★★ cInstructor, Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Hamburg.

PII: S0022-3913(02)00227-5

doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128175

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 367-374 , October 2002

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution