Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 423-430, October 2002

Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials☆☆★★

The University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Abstract 

Statement of Problem. Little evidence is available on the length of time that adhesive should be allowed to dry before irreversible hydrocolloid impression making. Purpose. This study investigated the effect of adhesive drying times on the bond strengths of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials to 2 “custom” tray materials. Material and Methods. A total of 1632 specimens were tested: 816 in tensile tests and 816 in tests of the shear bond strength (megapascals) of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials to an autopolymerizing and a visible light-polymerizing acrylic resin tray material. In the first part of the investigation, a single coat of adhesive was applied to specimen plates that simulated the custom impression tray surface; in the second part, a second coat of adhesive was applied after the irreversible hydrocolloid was removed, and the effect of this second coating on bond strength was examined. In both parts, the adhesive was allowed to dry for a range of times (0 to 8 minutes at 30-second intervals, for a total of 17 time periods) before the addition of the impression material. The specimen plates were placed in a humidor and separated in a universal testing machine operated at a crosshead speed of 100 mm/min with 0- to 5-kN load cell. Data from each of the 1632 specimens were collected and evaluated with analysis of variance, regression analysis, and t tests (P<.05). Results. Significant differences in mean bond strengths were found between specimens with a 4-minute adhesive drying time (0.179 MPa tensile, 0.068 MPa shear) and specimens with a 0-minute drying time (0.065 MPa tensile, 0.015 MPa shear). Any period over 4 minutes produced no significant difference. The mean bond strengths of the single-coated specimens were 0.179 MPa (tensile) and 0.076 MPa (shear). These values were significantly greater than those for specimens with a second adhesive layer (0.136 MPa tensile, 0.035 MPa shear) over all time periods. Mean tensile bond strengths (0.158 MPa) were consistently higher than shear bond strengths (0.056 MPa) for all combinations of tray material, adhesive application, and time. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that adhesive applied to the autopolymerized and light-polymerized custom tray materials tested should be allowed to dry for at least 4 minutes before irreversible hydrocolloid is applied. Better results were obtained when the adhesive layer from a failed irreversible hydrocolloid impression was removed and replaced rather than overlaid with an additional adhesive coating. (J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:423-30.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint requests to: Dr S. John S. Smith, The University Dental Hospital of Manchester,Higher Cambridge St, Manchester M15 6HF, UNITED KINGDOM, Fax: (44)161-275-7822, E-mail: mdtmssjs@fs1.den.man.ac.uk

☆☆ aUniversity Dental Instructor, Department of Restorative Dentistry.

 bProfessor, Restorative Care for the Elderly.

★★ cLecturer, Dental Statistics.

PII: S0022-3913(02)00235-4

doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.128746

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 423-430, October 2002