Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 485-490, November 2002

Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite☆☆★★

Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt; School of Dentistry, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England

Abstract 

Statement of Problem. Different fiber types are available for reinforcing composite restorations. Little information exists regarding optimal fiber type/bonding agent combinations. Purpose. This in vitro study examined the influence of storage time and 2 fiber wetting agents on the flexural properties of an indirect dental composite reinforced by 3 fiber types. Material and Methods. Three types of fiber (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, Kevlar, and Glass fiber) were used to reinforce samples of an indirect composite (Artglass) prepared to test flexural properties. Each fiber type was used to prepare 3 groups of 10 specimens after fiber wetting with an unfilled or a filled resin bonding agent. All fibers were weighed to an accuracy of 0.01 mg to standardize the amount of fiber placed in the base (tensile side) of the specimen preparation mold (2 × 2 × 25 mm). Fiber-reinforced samples wetted with the unfilled resin were stored for 24 hours before flexural testing, whereas separate groups of fiber-reinforced samples wetted with the filled resin were tested after both 24 hours and 6 months storage in water at 37°C. Two additional groups of unreinforced composite control specimens (10 samples per group) were prepared, one for each of the 2 storage times, resulting in 11 groups total. Mean flexural strengths (MPa) and flexural modulus (GPa) values were determined in a 3-point bend test at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min by use of a universal testing machine. Comparisons between means were performed with 2- and 1-way analysis of variance tests (α=.01) to demonstrate the influence of storage time, fiber wetting agent, and fiber type on the flexural properties of the indirect dental composite tested. Results. Significant increases (124% to 490%) in mean flexural strength (P<.01) were found for all fiber-reinforced groups in comparison to the unreinforced controls at both storage time intervals. The silane containing unfilled bonding agent gave the greatest reinforcing effect (364%) when used with the glass fiber material. After 6 months storage in water, a significant decline (28%) occurred in the mean flexural strength of the glass fiber-reinforced specimens (P<.01) when the filled bonding agent was used. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, the choice of fiber type and wetting agent was shown to have a significant positive influence on the flexural properties of the fiber-reinforced composite. When used with the silane containing unfilled bonding agent, the glass fiber increased the mean flexural strength of the unreinforced indirect composite by 364%. (J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:485-90.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint requests to: Dr Adrian C Shortall, The University of Birmingham, School of Dentistry, St. Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, ENGLAND, Fax: 44-121-237-2932, E-mail: a.c.c.shortall@bham.ac.uk

☆☆ aLecturer, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University.

 bSenior lecturer, Conservative Dentistry, The University of Birmingham.

★★ cProfessor of Biomaterials, Dean of Dental School, The University of Birmingham.

PII: S0022-3913(02)00256-1

doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.129303

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 485-490, November 2002