Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 6 , Pages 578-584 , December 2002

Computer-based evaluation of gender identification and morphologic classification of tooth face and arch forms

References 

  1. Brodbelt RH, Walker GF, Nelson D, Seluk LW. Comparison of face shape with tooth form. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:588–592
  2. Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Carlsson GE. Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. In: 11th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1997;p. 231; 326-28
  3. Seluk LW, Brodbelt RH, Walker GF. A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form. J Oral Rehabil. 1987;14:139–145
  4. Engelmeier RL. Complete-denture esthetics. Dent Clin North Am. 1996;40:71–84
  5. Sellen PN, Jagger DC, Harrison A. Computer-generated study of the correlation between tooth, face, arch forms, and palatal contour. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:163–168
  6. Winkler S. Essentials of complete denture prosthodontics. In: 2nd ed. Massachusetts: PSG Publishing Comp; 1988;p. 205–207
  7. Baskar RM, Davenport JC, Tomlin HR. Prosthetic treatment of the edentulous patient. In: 3rd ed. Hampshire: Macmillan Press Ltd; 1992;p. 183
  8. Leschot M, Stocker MW. Fundamental principles in the design of anterior teeth esthetics in complete denture prosthetics. In:  Schärer P,  Rinn LA,  Kopp FR editor. Esthetic guidelines for restorative dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing; 1982;p. 221–222
  9. Hayakawa I. Principles and practices of complete dentures. In: Osaka: Quintessence Publishing; 1999;p. 71
  10. Rufenacht CR. Principles of esthetic integration. In: Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2000;p. 144–145
  11. Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of esthetics. In: Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc; 1992;p. 99; 108-9
  12. Dunn WJ, Murchison DF, Broome JC. Esthetics: patients' perceptions of dental attractiveness. J Prosthodont. 1996;5:166–171
  13. Sherfudhin H, Abdullah MA, Khan N. A cross-sectional study of canine dimorphism in establishing sex identity: comparison of two statistical methods. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:627–631
  14. Hyde TP, McCord F, Macfarlane T, Smith J. Gender esthetics in the natural dentition. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent. 1999;7:27–30
  15. McCord JF, Burke T, Roberts C, Deakin M. Perceptions of denture aesthetics: a two-centre study of denture wearers and denture providers. Aust Dent J. 1994;39:365–367
  16. Kokich VO, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:311–324
  17. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. In: 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981;p. 212–225

☆ This study is supported by Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry State Planning Organization Project No 97K120490.

☆☆ Reprint requests to: Dr Semih Berksun, Ankara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Protez Bölümü, Beşevler, 06500, Ankara, TURKEY, Fax: 90-312-212-3954, E-mail: berksun@dentistry.ankara.edu.tr

★ aProfessor, Department of Prosthodontics.

★★ bProfessor, Department of Prosthodontics.

♢ cResearch Assistant, Department of Prosthodontics.

PII: S0022-3913(02)00291-3

doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129381

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 6 , Pages 578-584 , December 2002

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution