« Previous
Next »
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 87, Issue 1
, Pages 23-29
, January 2002
Accuracy of 3 conceptually different die systems used for implant casts
References
- . In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:413–417
- . Three-dimensional distortion of gold alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurement of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:557–564
- . In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:151–158
- . The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: is there such a thing as passive fit?. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995;24:138–157
- . Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:167–178
- . Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:314–325
- . Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:596–604
- . Fixed implant-supported prostheses with welded titanium frameworks. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12:177–184
- . Passive fit of implant-retained prosthetic superstructures improved by electric discharge machining. J Prosthodont. 1994;3:88–95
- . Fabrication of titanium implant-retained restorations with nontraditional machining techniques. Int J Prosthodont. 1995;8:332–336
- . Electrical discharge machining. J Dent Technol. 1997;14:19–22
- . The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthodont. 1993;2:75–82
- . Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:323–331
- . The accuracy of implant master cast constructed from transfer impression. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:331–336
- . An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:444–447
- . Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:448–455
- . Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:468–475
- . Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12:112–121
- . A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:588–593
-
.
The accuracy of three implant impression techniques: a 3-dimensional analysis.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:533–540
- . Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:216–222
- . Evaluation of the accuracy of solid implant casts. J Prosthodont. 1998;7:161–169
- . Evaluation of master cast technique for multiple abutment implant prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:439–446
-
.
Working casts and dies.
In: 3rd ed.
Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J editor.
Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. St Louis (MO): Mosby; 2001;p. 434–441
- . Accuracy and comparative stability of three removable die systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:314–318
- . Positional accuracy of four die tray systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:39–45
-
.
The Zeiser system: a method for accurate die placement.
Quintessence Dent Technol. 1990;14:188–192
- . A simplified system to develop precision master models. J Dent Technol. 1996;13:19–23
-
.
Technical assistance video for the DVA Model System [Video].
Anaheim Hills (CA): Dental Ventures of America; 1992;
- . An accuracy evaluation of four removable die systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:575–586
- . Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions. Dent Mater. 2000;16:145–149
- Revised American Dental Association Specification no. 19 for Non-aqueous, Elastomeric Dental Impression Materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977;94:733–741
-
.
Evaluation of the Vident die and model system.
San Antonio (TX): USAF Dental Investigation Services; 1991;
Report No: Project 90-63
- . The measurement of distortion: concluding remarks. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:218–223
- . Relative accuracy of four removable die systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48:163–165
☆ This project was supported in part by The Ohio State University College of Dentistry Student Summer Research Program (NIH DE 07155-13 grant) and presented in part at the International Association of Dental Research annual session, April 2000, Washington, DC.
☆☆ aAssistant Professor, Section of Restorative Dentistry, Prosthodontics and Endodontics, The Ohio State University.
★ bAssistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Toronto; Head of Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital.
★★ cThird-year dental student, The Ohio State University.
♢ Reprint requests to: Dr Alvin G. Wee, Section of Restorative Dentistry, Prosthodontics and Endodontics, The Ohio State University, Postle Hall, 305 W 12th Ave Columbus, OH 43210-1241, Fax: (614)292-9422 E-mail: Wee.12@osu.edu
PII: S0022-3913(02)27584-8
doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.121110
© 2002 Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 87, Issue 1
, Pages 23-29
, January 2002

