Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 87, Issue 4 , Pages 387-394, April 2002

Accuracy of a predetermined transverse horizontal mandibular axis point☆☆★★

An abstract (#764) of the pilot research was presented at the 27th annual session of the American Association for Dental Research in Minneapolis, Minn., March 1998.

School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisc

Abstract 

Statement of Problem. The transverse horizontal mandibular axis point may be located most precisely by a kinematic process. However, an anatomical method of locating the axis is also an acceptable technique, and an easily determined point that is consistently close to the kinematic axis would simplify transfer of the arc of rotation from the patient to the articulator. Purpose. This in vivo study compared the location of an anatomically predetermined hinge axis point with the determined kinematic axis. Material and Methods. Forty subjects (27 males, 13 females; 23 to 47 years of age) with functionally acceptable occlusion and no detectable clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders participated in the study. The earpiece alignment flags on a mechanical SAM Axiograph III combination flag/face-bow were used to locate the right and left predetermined hinge axis points, 10 mm anterior to the earpiece. The right and left kinematic center of rotation was located as described by Lauritzen and confirmed with the PC Axiotron electronic Axiograph to within 0.25 mm. All points were transferred to 1 mm2 grid paper on the subject's skin. The distance between each predetermined and kinematic point was measured ±0.25 mm. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests were used to examine differences between the left and right axis points and potential significant differences between genders at a significance level of P<.05. The number of occurrences and the distance of the predetermined axis points from the kinematic axis also were described. Results. The mean distance between points was 1.1 mm on the right (range 0.0 to 3.0 mm), 1.2 mm on the left (range 0.0 to 3.0 mm), and 1.1 mm for all 80 points (±0.63). More than 96% of the predetermined points were within 2 mm of the kinematic axis, and 67% were within 1 mm. There was no significant difference between the right and left points and no significant differences based on gender. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the predetermined axis point is well within the clinical norm for estimated location of the transverse horizontal mandibular axis. (J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:387-94.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 aAssociate Professor and Director, Graduate Prosthodontics.

☆☆ bAssistant Professor, Division of Prosthodontics.

 cAdjunct Associate Professor, Division of Prosthodontics.

★★ Reprint requests to: Dr William W. Nagy, Director, Graduate Prosthodontics, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53233, Fax: (414)288-6516, E-mail: william.nagy@marquette.edu

PII: S0022-3913(02)45175-X

doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.123351

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 87, Issue 4 , Pages 387-394, April 2002