Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 1 , Pages 54-59 , January 2003

Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: A pilot study

An abstract of this project was presented in poster format (767) during the 27th Annual Meeting of the AADR, Minneapolis, MN, on March 5, 1998.

References 

  1. Donegan SJ, Christensen LV. Sagittal condylar guidance as determined by protrusion records and wear facets of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;45:469–472
  2. Celenza FV. An analysis of articulators. Dent Clin North Am. 1979;23:305–326
  3. Payne JA. Condylar determinants in a patient: electronic pantographic assessment. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:157–163
  4. Bailey JO, Nowlin TP. Evaluation of the third point of reference for mounting maxillary casts on the Hanau articulator. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:199–201
  5. Weinberg LA. An evaluation of basic articulators and their concepts: Part II. Arbitrary, positional, semiadjustable articulators. J Prosthet Dent. 1963;13:645–663
  6. Pelletier LB, Campbell SD. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:193–200
  7. Ecker GA, Goodacre CJ, Dykema RW. A comparison of condylar control settings obtained from wax interocclusal records and simplified mandibular motion analyzers. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:404–406
  8. Posselt UP, Skytting B. Registration of the condyle path inclination: variations using the Gysi technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1960;10:243–247
  9. El-Gheriani AS, Winstanley RB. Graphic tracings of condylar paths and measurements of condylar angles. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:77–87
  10. Preti G, Scotti RS, Bruscagin C. A clinical study of graphic registration of the condylar path inclination. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48:461–466
  11. Posselt UP, Franzen G. Registration of the condyle path inclination by intraoral wax records: variations in three instruments. J Prosthet Dent. 1960;10:441–454
  12. Christensen C. The problem of the bite. Dent Cosmos. 1905;47:1184–1195
  13. Kinderknecht KE, Wong GK, Billy EJ, Li SH. The effect of a deprogrammer on the position of the terminal transverse horizontal axis of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:123–131
  14. Craddock FW. The accuracy and practical value of records of condyle path inclination. J Am Dent Assoc. 1949;38:697–710
  15. Olsson A, Posselt U. Relationship of various skull reference lines. J Prosthet Dent. 1961;11:1045–1049
  16. dos Santos J, Nelson SJ, Nummikoski P. Geometric analysis of occlusal plane orientation using simulated ear-rod facebow transfer. J Prosthodont. 1996;5:172–181
  17. Strohaver RA, Ryan JR. New facebow simplifies routine use and dental laboratory cooperation. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60:638–641
  18. Zamacona JM, Otaduy E, Aranda E. Study of the sagittal condylar path in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:314–317

☆ Reprint requests to: Dr Jose dos Santos Jr, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Occlusion, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, Tel: (210) 567-3671, Fax: (210) 567-3669, E-mail: santos@uthscsa.edu

☆☆ aProfessor, Division of Occlusion, Department of Restorative Dentistry.

★ bAssociate Professor, Division of Occlusion, Department of Restorative Dentistry.

★★ cProfessor and Head, Division of Occlusion, Department of Restorative Dentistry.

♢ 0022-3913/2003/$30.00 + 0

PII: S0022-3913(02)52720-7

doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.11

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 1 , Pages 54-59 , January 2003

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution