Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 141-145, February 2003

A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations☆☆☆★★★♢♢♢♦

University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

☆ Reprint requests to: Dr D Andrew Lane, Apollonia House, 73a High St, Uppermill, Oldham, OL3 6AP, UNITED KINGDOM, Fax: 44-1457-879546, E-mail: lane@vtsurvey.com

☆☆ Grant and materials supplied by 3M/ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.

★ aResearch Assistant, Unit of Operative Dentistry and Endodontology, University Dental Hospital of Manchester.

★★ bClinical Research Manager, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.

♢ cPractice Manager, Apollonia House, Uppermill, Oldham, UK.

♢♢ dProfessor of Restorative Dentistry, King's College, London, England; Formerly of Unit of Operative Dentistry and Endodontology, University Dental Hospital of Manchester.

♦ 0022-3913/2003/$30.00 + 0

PII: S0022-3913(02)52734-7

doi:10.1067/mpr.2003.25

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 141-145, February 2003

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution