Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 141-145 , February 2003

A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations

References 

  1. Wilson EG, Werrin SR. Double arch impressions for simplified restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:198–202
  2. Werrin SR. The origin of a new impression tray. Indep Dentistry. 2000;6:78–83
  3. Parker MH, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Reid DE. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:255–259
  4. Cox JR, Brandt RL, Hughes HJ. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:510–515
  5. Kaplowitz GJ. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions II. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:1277–1281
  6. Burke FJ, Crisp RJ. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique. Quintessence Int. 2001;32:805–810

☆ Reprint requests to: Dr D Andrew Lane, Apollonia House, 73a High St, Uppermill, Oldham, OL3 6AP, UNITED KINGDOM, Fax: 44-1457-879546, E-mail: lane@vtsurvey.com

☆☆ Grant and materials supplied by 3M/ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.

★ aResearch Assistant, Unit of Operative Dentistry and Endodontology, University Dental Hospital of Manchester.

★★ bClinical Research Manager, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.

♢ cPractice Manager, Apollonia House, Uppermill, Oldham, UK.

♢♢ dProfessor of Restorative Dentistry, King's College, London, England; Formerly of Unit of Operative Dentistry and Endodontology, University Dental Hospital of Manchester.

♦ 0022-3913/2003/$30.00 + 0

PII: S0022-3913(02)52734-7

doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.25

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 141-145 , February 2003

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution