« Previous
Next »
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 3
, Pages 244-249
, March 2003
The anterior cantilever in the implant-supported screw-retained mandibular prosthesis
References
- . A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:387–416
-
.
Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry.
In: 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985;p. 51–70
- . The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;27:120–132
-
.
Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients.
In: 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997;p. 40
- . The bony residual ridge in man. J Prosthet Dent. 1975;34:456–462
-
.
Contemporary implant dentistry.
In: 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998;p. 113
- . Critical A-P spread. Implant Soc. 1990;1:2–3
- . Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:241–247
- . Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:843–848
- . Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:331–339
- . Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts. Quintessence Int. 1989;20:473–480
- . Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:23–26
-
.
The Branemark implant system: clinical and laboratory procedures.
In: St. Louis: Medico Dental Media; 1989;p. 73
-
.
Osseointegration and occlusal rehabilitation.
In: Chicago: Quintessence; 1989;p. 179
- . The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:185–194
- . Esthetic and biomechanical considerations in reconstructions using dental implants. Dent Clin North Am. 1992;36:713–741
- . A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:949–956
- . Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:59–63
- . Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:493–499
- . Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:347–359
- . In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:413–417
- . Osseointegration and the edentulous predicament: the 10-year-old Toronto study. Br Dent J. 1991;170:439–444
- . Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:169–178
- . Problems with prostheses on implants: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:283–288
- . Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:26–33
- . Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42:71–89
- . Mandibular deformation in subjects with osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:319–328
- . Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:96–102
- . Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching. J Dent Res. 1994;73:56–66
- . The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructures. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:169–174
- . Significance of the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle to prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36:624–635
- . Residual alveolar ridge atrophy: classification and influence of facial morphology. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:90–100
- . An analysis of the relationship between mandibular alveolar bone loss and a low Frankfort-mandibular plane angle. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:513–516
- . Use of implants in restorative therapy in patients with reduced periodontal tissue support. Quintessence Int. 1988;19:801–807
- . The use of attachments in combination implant and natural-tooth fixed partial dentures: a technical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:230–234
- . Biomechanical load analysis of cantilevered implant systems. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17:40–47
- . Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1992;3:104–111
- . Full-arch implant framework casting accuracy: preliminary in vitro observations for in vivo testing. J Prosthodont. 1993;2:2–8
- . The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;2:77–84
- . Influence of mandibular superstructure shape on implant stresses during simulated posterior biting. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:67–72
-
FaroArm Technologies Inc Manual. 1999;
-
.
The FaroArm product page.
Available at
http://faroarm.comMarch 20, 2002;
Accessed
- . Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:74–78
-
.
Methods of recording patterns of behavior of the oro-facial muscles using the electromyograph.
Trans Brit Soc Study Orthodont. 1953;96:88–95
☆ Research supported in part by The Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, R01DE12225.
☆☆ Reprint requests to: Dr Mary Elizabeth Brosky, Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, 9-450a Moos Tower Office, 515 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, Fax: 612-626-1496, E-mail: brosk001@tc.umn.edu
★ aAssistant Professor, Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences.
★★ bAssociate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
♢ cSenior Research Associate, Division of Biostatistics.
♢♢ 0022-3913/2003/$30.00 + 0
PII: S0022-3913(02)52743-8
doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.43
© 2003 Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 3
, Pages 244-249
, March 2003

