Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 6 , Pages 551-557 , June 2003

Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations

  • Annie J St-Georges, DMD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Annie J. St-Georges, University of Montreal, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Restorative Dentistry, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal (Quebec), H3C 3J7, Canada, Fax: (514) 343-2233
    • ,
  • John R Sturdevant, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Associate professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA
    • ,
  • Edward J Swift Jr, DMD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Professor and chairman, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA
    • ,
  • Jeffrey Y Thompson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA

References 

  1. Ritter AV. Posterior resin-based composite restorations (clinical recommendations for optimal success). J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13:88–99
  2. Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth (some clinical implications). Int Dent J. 1991;41:25–32
  3. Vale WA. Cavity preparation. Irish Dent Rev. 1956;2:33–41
  4. Blaser PK, Lund MR, Cochran MA, Potter RH. Effect of designs of class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture. Oper Dent. 1983;8:6–10
  5. Larson TD, Douglas WH, Geistfeld RE. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth. Oper Dent. 1981;6:2–5
  6. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, de Lima Navarro MF, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:419–422
  7. Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:576–585
  8. Khera SC, Goel VK, Chen RC, Gurusami SA. Parameters of MOD cavity preparations (a 3-D FEM study, Part II). Oper Dent. 1991;16:42–54
  9. Khera SC, Goel VK, Chen RC, Gurusami SA. A three-dimensional finite element model. Oper Dent. 1988;13:128–137
  10. el-Badrawy WA. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam. Oper Dent. 1999;24:337–343
  11. McCullock AJ, Smith BG. In vitro studies of cusp reinforcement with adhesive restorative material. Br Dent J. 1986;161:450–452
  12. Re GJ, Norling BK, Draheim RN. Fracture strength of molars containing three surface amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;47:185–187
  13. Studer SP, Wettstein F, Lehner C, Zullo TG, Scharer P. Long-term survival estimates of cast gold inlays and onlays with their analysis of failures. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:461–472
  14. Eakle WS, Staninec M. Effect of bonded gold inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:421–425
  15. Denehy GE, Torney DL. Internal enamel reinforcement through micromechanical bonding. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36:171–175
  16. Gelb MN, Barouch E, Simonsen RJ. Resistance to cusp fracture in class II prepared and restored premolars. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:184–185
  17. Mackenzie DF. The reinforcing effect of mesio-occlusodistal acid-etch composite restorations on weakened posterior teeth. Br Dent J. 1986;161:410–414
  18. Jagadish S, Yogesh BG. Fracture resistance of teeth with class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent. 1990;15:42–47
  19. Bremer BD, Geurtsen W. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Am J Dent. 2001;14:216–220
  20. Cotert HS, Sen BH, Balkan M. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:374–378
  21. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:1033–1042
  22. Ausiello P, Davidson CL, Cascone P, DeGee AJ, Rengo S. Debonding of adhesively restored deep class II MOD restorations after functional loading. Am J Dent. 1999;12:84–88
  23. Clotten S, Blunck U, Roulet JF. The influence of a simplified application technique for ceramic inlays on the margin quality. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:159–166
  24. Boyer DB, Roth L. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent. 1994;7:91–94
  25. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. In: Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001;p. 571
  26. Thompson JY, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Mechanical properties of a new mica-based machinable glass ceramic for CAD/CAM restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:619–623
  27. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays (a systematic review). Dent Mater. 1999;15:54–61
  28. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:239–246
  29. Kelly JR, Giordano R, Pober R, Cima MJ. Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics (clinically failed restorations). Int J Prosthodont. 1990;3:430–440
  30. Peters MC, de Vree JH, Brekelmans WA. Distributed crack analysis of ceramic inlays. J Dent Res. 1993;72:1537–1542
  31. Eakle WS, Maxwell EH, Braly BV. Fractures of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986;112:215–218
  32. Eakle WS. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II bonded composite resin. J Dent Res. 1986;65:149–153
  33. Joynt RB, Davis EL, Wieczkowski G, Williams DA. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with glass ionomer-composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:28–31
  34. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:257–260
  35. Stampalia LL, Nicholls JI, Brudvik JS, Jones DW. Fracture resistance of teeth with resin-bonded restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:694–698
  36. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:652–661

PII: S0022-3913(03)00173-2

doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00173-2

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 89, Issue 6 , Pages 551-557 , June 2003

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution