« Previous
Next »
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 90, Issue 2
, Pages 143-149
, August 2003
The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions
References
- . Double arch impressions for simplified restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:198–202
- . Dual-arch impressions. Aust Dent J. 1992;37:1–5
- . Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:234–240
- . Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions II. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:1277–1281
- . Simplifying dual-arch impressions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:1599–1600
- . Marginal adaptation of castings made with dual-arch and custom trays. Am J Dent. 1992;5:253–254
- . Dual-arch and custom tray impression accuracy. Am J Dent. 1991;4:89–92
- . Accuracy of second pour casts using dual-arch impressions. Am J Dent. 1992;5:192–194
- . Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:403–407
- . The measurement of distortion (theoretical considerations). J Prosthet Dent. 1977;37:578–586
- . Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:484–490
- . Comparison of conventional paint-on die spacers and those used with the all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:151–155
PII: S0022-3913(03)00276-2
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00276-2
© 2003 The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 90, Issue 2
, Pages 143-149
, August 2003

