Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 90, Issue 6 , Pages 547-555 , December 2003

In vitro assessment of retention of four esthetic dowels to resin core foundation and teeth

Presented at the 2002 Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics meeting.

  • Fahad Al-harbi, BDS, MSD

      Affiliations

    • Doctor of Science Candidate, Boston, Mass, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Fahad Al-harbi, Department of Restorative Sciences/Biomaterials, 801 Albany St, Suite 200 Boston, MA 02118-2392, USA, Fax: 617-638-5591
  • ,
  • Dan Nathanson, DMD, MSD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Restorative Sciences and Biomaterials, Boston, Mass, USA

References 

  1. Malquarti G, Berruet RG, Bois D. Prosthetic use of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin for esthetic crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:251–257
  2. Bergman M, Bergman B, Soremark R. Tissue accumulation of nickel released due to electrochemical corrosion of non-precious dental casting alloys. J Oral Rehabil. 1980;7:325–330
  3. Newman S, Chamberlain RT, Nunez LJ. Nickel solubility from nickel-chromium dental casting alloys. J Biomed Mater Res. 1981;15:615–617
  4. Bearden LJ, Cooke FW. Growth inhibition of cultured fibroblasts by cobalt and nickel. J Biomed Mater Res. 1980;14:289–309
  5. Jacobsen N. Epithelial-like cells in culture derived from human gingiva (response to nickel). Scand J Dent Res. 1977;85:567–574
  6. Viguie G, Malquarti G, Vincent B, Bourgeois D. Epoxy/carbon composite resins in dentistry (mechanical properties related to fiber reinforcements). J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:245–249
  7. Hochman N, Zalkind M. New all-ceramic indirect post-and-core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:625–629
  8. Roberts DH. The failure of retainers in bridge prostheses. An analysis of 2000 retainers. Br Dent J. 1970;128:117–124
  9. Lewis R, Smith BG. A clinical survey of failed post retained crowns. Br Dent J. 1988;165:95–97
  10. Mentink AG, Meeuwissen R, Kayser AF, Mulder J. Survival rate and failure characteristics of the all metal post and core restoration. J Oral Rehabil. 1993;20:455–461
  11. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:439–444
  12. Valderhaug J. A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991;49:35–40
  13. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Platzer U, McMullan-Vogel CG. Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:451–457
  14. Levartovsky S, Kuyini E, Georgescu M, Goldstein GR. A comparison of the diametral tensile strength, the flexural strength, and the compressive strength of two new core materials to a silver alloy-reinforced glass-ionomer material. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:481–485
  15. Cho GC, Kaneko LM, Donovan TE, White SN. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:272–276
  16. Hochman N, Feinzaig I, Zalkind M. Effect of design of pre-fabricated posts and post heads on the retention of various cements and core materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:702–707
  17. Chang WC, Millstein PL. Effect of design of prefabricated post heads on core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:475–482
  18. Arcoria CJ, Dewald JP, Moody CR, Ferracane JL. A comparative study of bond strengths of amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores. J Oral Rehabil. 1989;16:301–307
  19. Kane JJ, Burgess JO, Summitt JB. Fracture resistance of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:607–613
  20. Millstein PL, Ho J, Nathanson D. Retention between a serrated steel dowel and different core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:480–482
  21. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:487–495
  22. Zalkind M, Shkury S, Stern N, Heling I. Effect of prefabricated metal post-head design on the retention of various core materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:483–487
  23. Love RM, Purton DG. The effect of serrations on carbon fibre posts-retention within the root canal, core retention, and post rigidity. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:484–488
  24. Colley IT, Hampson EL, Lehman ML. Retention of post crowns (an assessment of retentive efficiency of posts of different sizes and shapes). Br Dent J. 1968;124:63–69
  25. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels (effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design). J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:400–405
  26. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. Effect of surface design on retention of dowels cemented with a resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:403–405
  27. Ruemping DR, Lund MR, Schnell RJ. Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:159–162
  28. Duncan JP, Pameijer CH. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents (an in vitro study). J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:423–428
  29. Qualtrough AJ, Chandler NP, Purton DG. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts. Quintessence Int. 2003;34:199–201
  30. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Ozcan M, Platzer U. Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:28–34
  31. Goldman M, DeVitre R, Pier M. Effect of the dentin smeared layer on tensile strength of cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:485–488
  32. Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Urstein M, Gontar G, Fitzig S. Conditioning of root canals prior to dowel cementation with composite luting cement and two dentin adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1989;16:597–602
  33. Chapman KW, Worley JL, von Fraunhofer JA. Effect of bonding agents on retention of posts. Gen Dent. 1985;33:128–130
  34. Tjan AH, Castelnuovo J, Liu P. Bond strength of multi-step and simplified-step systems. Am J Dent. 1996;9:269–272
  35. Hosoya Y, Nishiguchi M, Kashiwabara Y, Horiuchi A, Goto G. Comparison of two dentin adhesives to primary vs. permanent bovine dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1997;22:69–76
  36. Wilder AD, Swift EJ, May KN, Waddell SL. Bond strengths of conventional and simplified bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1998;11:114–117
  37. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS, Cofrancesco G. Pilot study of the effects of three bonding systems on the torsional resistance of titanium-reinforced composite core. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:277–280
  38. Knight JS, Sneed WD, Wilson MC. Strengths of composite bonded to base metal alloy using dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:149–153
  39. Goldman M, DeVitre R, White R, Nathanson D. An SEM study of posts cemented with an unfilled resin. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1003–1005
  40. White RR, Goldman M, Lin PS. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by endodontic filling materials. Part II. J Endod. 1987;13:369–374
  41. Pashley DH. Smear layer (physiological considerations). Oper Dent Suppl. 1984;3:13–29
  42. Burns DR, Douglas HB, Moon PC. Comparison of the retention of endodontic posts after preparation with EDTA. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:262–266
  43. Kakehashi Y, Luthy H, Naef R, Wohlwend A, Scharer P. A new all-ceramic post and core system (clinical, technical, and in vitro results). Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998;18:586–593
  44. Millstein OL, Yu H, Hsu CS, Nathanson D. Effects of cementing on retention of a prefabricated screw post. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:171–174
  45. Prati C, Chersoni S, Pashley DH. Effect of removal of surface collagen fibrils on resin-dentin bonding. Dent Mater. 1999;15:323–331
  46. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1168–1178
  47. Stockton LW, Williams PT, Clarke CT. Post retention and post/core shear bond strength of four post systems. Oper Dent. 2000;25:441–447

PII: S0022-3913(03)00674-7

doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.014

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 90, Issue 6 , Pages 547-555 , December 2003