Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 83-89 , July 2004

An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators

  • Willy S.W. Chang, BDSc, MS

      Affiliations

    • Former Resident, Advanced Education in Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry USA
    • ,
  • Elaine Romberg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Oral Health Care Delivery USA
    • ,
  • Carl F. Driscoll, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Program Director, Advanced Education in Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Carl F. Driscoll Rm 3D08, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery Dental School, University of Maryland 666 W Baltimore St Baltimore, MD 21201 Fax: (410) 706-3028
    • ,
  • Michael J. Tabacco, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry USA

References 

  1. Anderson GC, Schulte JK, Arnold TG. An in vitro study of an electronic pantograph. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:577–580
  2. Payne JA. Condylar determinants in a patient population: electronic pantograph assessment. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:157–163
  3. Beard CC, Donaldson K, Clayton JA. Comparison of an electronic and a mechanical pantograph. Part I: Consistency of an electronic computerized pantograph to record articulator settings. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:570–574
  4. Coye RB. A study of the variability of setting a fully adjustable gnathological articulator to a pantographic tracing. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;37:460–468
  5. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 5th ed.. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2002; p. 127-46
  6. Ramfjord SP, Ash MM. Occlusion. 4th ed.. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995; p. 77-83
  7. Lundeen HC, Shryock EF, Gibbs CH. An evaluation of mandibular border movements: their character and significance. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40:442–452
  8. Schulte JK, Wang SH, Erdman AG, Anderson GC. Three-dimensional analysis of cusp travel during a non working mandibular movement. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:839–843
  9. Schulte JK, Wang SH, Erdman AG, Anderson GC. Working condylar movement and its effects on posterior occlusal morphology. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:118–121
  10. Bernhardt O, Kuppers N, Rosin M, Meyer G. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:175–179
  11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310
  12. Preti G, Scotti R, Bruscagin C, Carossa S. A clinical study of graphic registration of the condylar path inclination. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48:461–465
  13. Beard CC, Donaldson K, Clayton JA. A comparison of articulator settings to age and sex. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56:551–554
  14. Isaacson D. A clinical study of the Bennett movement. J Prosthet Dent. 1958;8:641–649
  15. Curtis DA. A comparison of lateral interocclusal records to pantographic tracings. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:23–27

☆ Presented at the American Academy of Dental Research Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, March 2003.

PII: S0022-3913(04)00226-4

doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.011

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 83-89 , July 2004

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution