Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 5 , Pages 441-446 , November 2004

Analysis of strain around endosseous dental implants opposing natural teeth or implants

  • Canan Hekimoglu, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor.
    • ,
  • Nesrin Anıl, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor.
    • ,
  • Murat C. Cehreli, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Murat Cehreli Gazi Mustafa Kemal Bulvarı 61/11 06570 Maltepe Ankara, TURKEY Fax: +90.312.311 3741

References 

  1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:399–410
  2. Listgarten MA. Soft and hard tissue response to endosseous dental implants. Anat Rec. 1996;245:410–425
  3. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:S96–S101
  4. Johansson RS, Olsson KA. Microelectrode recordings from human oral mechanoreceptors. Brain Res. 1976;118:307–311
  5. Dong WK, Chuldler EH, Martin RF. Physiological properties of interdental mechanoreceptors. Brain Res. 1985;389–395
  6. Lambrichts I, Creemers J, van Steenberghe D. Morphology of neural endings in the human periodontal ligament: an electron microscopy study. J Periodontal Res. 1992;27:191–196
  7. Jacobs R. Neurological versus psychophysical assessment of osseoperception. In:  Jacobs R editors. Osseoperception. Leuven: Catholic University Leuven; 1998;p. 75–88
  8. Van Loven K, Jacobs R, Swinnen A, Van Huffel S, Van Hees J, van Steenberghe D. Sensations and trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potentials elicited by electrical stimulation of endosseous oral implants in humans. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45:1083–1090
  9. Jacobs R, Wu CH, Goossens K, Van Loven K, van Steenberghe D. Perceptual changes in the anterior maxilla after placement of endosseous implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3:148–155
  10. Jacobs R, Bou Serhal C, van Steenberghe D. The stereognostic ability of natural dentitions versus implant-supported fixed prostheses or overdentures. Clin Oral Investig. 1997;1:89–94
  11. van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, Naert I. A prospective split-mouth comparative study of two screw-shaped self-tapping pure titanium implant systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:202–209
  12. Moberg LE, Kondell PA, Sagulin GB, Bolin A, Heimdahl A, Gynther GW. Brånemark system and ITI Dental Implant System for treatment of mandibular edentulism. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:450–461
  13. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Grondahl K. Astra Tech and Branemark System implants: a prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 1999;1:17–26
  14. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I, Maffei G, Jacobs R. Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28:628–633
  15. Branemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Branemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6:227–231
  16. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (II) Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:721–764
  17. Frost HM. A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain. Clin Orthop. 1983;175:286–292
  18. Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:175–188
  19. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, Valiquette N. Dental implant design-effect on bone remodelling. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:467–483
  20. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success of the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:104–111
  21. Wiskott HW, Belser UC. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:429–444
  22. Weinberg LA, Kruger B. Biomechanical considerations when combining tooth-supported and implant supported prostheses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78:22–27
  23. Menicucci G, Mossolov A, Mozzati M, Lorenzetti M, Preti G. Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:334–341
  24. Sheets CG, Earthman JC. Natural tooth intrusion and reversal in implant-assisted prosthesis: Evidence of and a hypothesis for the occurrence. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:513–520
  25. Cho GC, Chee WW. Apparent tooth intrusion of natural teeth under an implant-supported prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:3–5
  26. Garcia LT, Oesterle LJ. Natural tooth intrusion phenomenon with implants: a survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:227–231
  27. Block MS, Lirette D, Gardiner D, Li L, Finger IM, Hochstedler J, et al. Prospective evaluation of implants connected to teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:473–487
  28. Fugazzotto PA, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Neuendorff G. Implant/tooth-connected restorations utilizing screw-fixed attachments: a survey of 3,096 sites in function for 3 to 14 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:819–823
  29. Akpınar I, Anıl N, Parnas L. A natural tooth's stress distribution in occlusion with a dental implant. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:538–545
  30. Aydinlik E, Dayangac B, Celik E. Effect of splinting on abutment tooth movement. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:477–480
  31. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Sadler JP, McKay ML. Mechanical considerations for the implant tooth-supported fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:487–492
  32. Heckmann SM, Winter W, Meyer M, Weber HP, Wichmann MG. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 1: In vivo verification of stereolithographic model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:617–623
  33. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K, Cehreli MC, Sahin S. Comparison of non-linear finite element analysis with in vitro strain-gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:258–265
  34. Gross MD, Nissan J, Samuel R. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part I. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:442–449
  35. Cehreli M, Duyck J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Implant design and interface force transfer: a photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:249–257
  36. Raadsheer MC, van Eijden TM, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude. J Dent Res. 1999;78:31–42

 This study was funded by the Scientific Research Unit of Hacettepe University (Project No. 0102201005).

PII: S0022-3913(04)00489-5

doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.023

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 5 , Pages 441-446 , November 2004

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution