Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 93, Issue 1 , Pages 51-55 , January 2005

Effect of bonding amalgam on the reinforcement of teeth

  • Ammar A. Rasheed, BDS, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Ajman University
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Ammar A. Rasheed c/o Hayder A. Rasheed Department of Civil Engineering Kansas State University 2118 Fiedler Hall Manhattan, KS 66506 Fax: (785) 587-8605

References 

  1. Snyder DE. The cracked-tooth syndrome and fractured posterior cusp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976;41:698–704
  2. In:  Shovelton D,  Shortall A,  Howe L,  Kantorowicz GF editor. Inlays, crowns and bridges: a clinical handbook. 5th ed.. Bristol: Wright; 1993;p. 32–38
  3. Blaser PK, Lund MR, Cochran MA, Potter RH. Effects of designs of class II preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture. Oper Dent. 1983;8:6–10
  4. Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH. Bonding of amalgam restoration: existing knowledge and future prospects. Oper Dent. 2000;25:121–129
  5. Denehy GE, Torney DL. Internal enamel reinforcement through micromechanical bonding. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36:171–175
  6. Gorucu J, Ozgunaltay G. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations. Oper Dent. 2003;28:501–507
  7. Pilo R, Brosh T, Chweidan H. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations. J Dent. 1998;26:467–472
  8. Staninec M, Holt M. Bonding of amalgam to tooth structure: Tensile adhesion and micro leakage tests. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:397–402
  9. Christensen GJ. The rise of resin for cementing restoration. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993;124:104–105
  10. Szep S, Schmid C, Weigl P, Hahn L, Heidemann D. Effect of the silicone disclosing procedure on the shear bond strength of composite cement to ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:60–65
  11. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:257–260
  12. Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 1992;17:112–119
  13. Belcher MA, Stewart GP. Two years clinical evaluation of an adhesive amalgam. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:309–314
  14. Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Batzer RC. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126:735–739
  15. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3:133–138
  16. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 4th ed.. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001;p. 243-58
  17. McCullock AJ, Smith BG. In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials. Br Dent J. 1986;161:405
  18. Bonilla E, White SN. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 1996;21:122–126
  19. Waters NE. Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. In: Vincent JF, Curry JD, editors. Mechanical properties of biological materials. Society of Experimental Biology Symposia. Cambridge University Press; 1980. p. 99-135.

PII: S0022-3913(04)00689-4

doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.014

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 93, Issue 1 , Pages 51-55 , January 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution