Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 4 , Pages 363-369 , October 2005

Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent

  • Duygu Sarac, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Duygu Sarac, Ondokuz Mayis Unİversİtesİ, Dİs Hekİmlİgİ Fakultesİ, Protetİk Dİs Tedavİsİ A.D., 55139 Kurupelİt, Samsun, TURKEY, Fax: +90 362 457 60 32
    • ,
  • Y. Sinasi Sarac, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor
    • ,
  • Safak Kulunk, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant
    • ,
  • Tolga Kulunk, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant

References 

  1. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Hassam MM. Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:122–128
  2. Grasso CA, Caluori DM, Goldstein GR, Hittelman E. In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:437–441
  3. Baier RE. Principles of adhesion. Oper Dent. 1992;5:1–9
  4. Terata R. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement–study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J. 1993;12:18–28
  5. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 1999;107:65–69
  6. Leirskar J, Nordbo H. The effect of zinc oxide-eugenol on the shear bond strength of a commonly used bonding system. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000;16:265–268
  7. Spohr AM, Correr Sobrinho L, Consani S, Sinhoreti MA, Borges GA. Effect of refrigeration on tensile bond strength of three adhesive systems. Braz Dent J. 2001;12:75–79
  8. Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent. 2001;26:556–561
  9. Rosales-Leal JI, Osorio R, Toledano M, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA, Millstein PL. Influence of eugenol contamination on the wetting of ground and etched dentin. Oper Dent. 2003;28:695–699
  10. Lingard GL, Davies EH, Von Fraunhofer JA. The interaction between lining materials and composite resin restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1981;8:121–129
  11. Woody TL, Davis RD. The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper Dent. 1992;17:175–180
  12. Paul SJ, Scharer P. Effect of previsional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:8–14
  13. Bachmann M, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Effect of cleansing dentine with soap and pumice on shear bond strength of dentine-bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:433–438
  14. Finger WJ, Balkenhol M. Rewetting strategies for bonding to dry dentin with an acetone-based adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2:51–56
  15. Pereira GD, Paulillo LA, De Goes MF, Dias CT. How wet should dentin be? Comparison of methods to remove excess water during moist bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:257–264
  16. Nakaoki Y, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Effect of residual water on dentin bond strength and hybridization of a one-bottle adhesive system. Oper Dent. 2002;27:563–568
  17. Toledano M, Osorio R, Perdigao J, Rosales JI, Thompson JY, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Effect of acid etching and collagen removal on dentin wettability and roughness. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;47:198–203
  18. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different adhesive systems. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1530–1540

PII: S0022-3913(05)00395-1

doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.009

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 4 , Pages 363-369 , October 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution