Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 4 , Pages 342-349 , October 2005

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays

  • Christian Hannig, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Christian Hannig, Department of Operative Dentistry, Preventive Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Gottingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Gottingen, GERMANY, Fax: 49 551 39-2037
    • ,
  • Christoph Westphal

      Affiliations

    • Doctoral Candidate
    • ,
  • Klaus Becker

      Affiliations

    • Technical Assistant
    • ,
  • Thomas Attin, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Department Head

References 

  1. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989;15:512–516
  2. Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6:49–55
  3. Huang TJ, Schilder H, Nathanson D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. J Endod. 1992;18:209–215
  4. Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994;10:91–93
  5. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle?. J Endod. 1992;18:325–332
  6. Blaser PK, Lund MR, Cochran MA, Potter RH. Effect of designs of Class-2-preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture. Oper Dent. 1983;8:6–10
  7. Re GJ, Draheim RN, Norling BK. Fracture resistance of mandibular molars with occlusal class I amalgam preparations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1981;103:580–583
  8. Steele A, Johnson BR. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. J Endod. 1999;25:6–8
  9. Eakle WS, Maxwell EH, Braly BV. Fractures of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986;112:215–218
  10. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with enamel-bobded resin. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6:218–225
  11. Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:576–585
  12. Owen CP. Factors influencing the retention and resistance of preparations for cast intracoronal restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:674–677
  13. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent. 1997;10:237–241
  14. Katebzadeh N, Dalton BC, Trope M. Strengthening immature teeth during and after apexification. J Endod. 1998;24:256–259
  15. Bremer BD, Geurtsen W. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Am J Dent. 2001;14:216–220
  16. Hofmann N, Just B, Hugo B, Klaiber B. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 1998;2:77–83
  17. Gorucu J, Ozgunaltay . Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth colored restorations. Oper Dent. 2003;28:501–507
  18. St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:551–557
  19. Costa LC, Pegararo LF, Bonfante G. Influence of different metal restorations bonded with resin on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:365–369
  20. Oliveira Fde C, Denehy GE, Boyer DB. Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987;115:57–60
  21. Trope M, Langer I, Maltz D, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated premolars. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986;2:35–38
  22. Wendt SL, Harris BM, Hunt TE. Resistance to cusp fracture in endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater. 1987;3:232–235
  23. Zidan O, Abdel-Keriem U. The effect of amalgam bonding on the stiffness of teeth weakened by cavity preparation. Dent Mater. 2003;19:680–685
  24. Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N. CEREC: science, research, and clinical application. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001;22:7–13
  25. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent. 1997;25:459–473
  26. Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. J Dent. 2000;28:529–535
  27. Mormann W, Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:109–115
  28. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:194–200
  29. Reiss B, Walther W. Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent. 2000;3:9–23
  30. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:392–399
  31. Yoshida K, Condon JR, Atsuta M, Ferracane JL. Flexural fatigue strength of CAD/CAM composite material and dual-cured resin luting cements. Am J Dent. 2003;16:177–180
  32. Cardash HS, Baharav H, Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. The effect of porcelain color on the hardness of luting composite resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:620–623
  33. Hulsmann M, Gressmann G, Schafers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;36:358–366
  34. Hata G, Kawazoe S, Toda T, Weine FS. Sealing ability of Thermafil with and without sealer. J Endod. 1992;18:322–326
  35. Hata G, Kawazoe S, Toda T, Weine FS. Sealing ability of thermoplasticized gutta-percha fill techniques as assessed by a new method of determining apical leakage. J Endod. 1995;21:167–172
  36. Mannocci F, Innocenti M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Dye leakage and SEM study of roots obturated with Thermafill and dentin bonding agent. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999;15:60–64
  37. Sato K, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Relation between cavity design and marginal adaptation in a machine-milled ceramic restorative system. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:24–27
  38. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent. 2000;25:11–19
  39. van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L, Ormin A, Olofsson AL. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109:222–229
  40. Gemalmaz D, Ergin S. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:189–196
  41. Blum JY, Machtou P, Micallef JP. Analysis of forces developed during obturations Wedging effect: part II. J Endod. 1998;24:223–228
  42. Obermayr G, Walton RE, Leary JM, Krell KV. Vertical root fracture and relative deformation during obturation and post cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:181–187

PII: S0022-3913(05)00401-4

doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.004

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 4 , Pages 342-349 , October 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution