Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 6 , Pages 539-548, December 2005

The effect of investment material type on the contamination zone and mechanical properties of commercially pure titanium castings

  • Dimitris Eliopoulos, DDS, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Postgraduate student, Department of Biomaterials
  • ,
  • Spiros Zinelis, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Metallurgical Engineer, Department of Biomaterials
  • ,
  • Triantafillos Papadopoulos, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Biomaterials
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Triantafillos Papadopoulos, Department of Biomaterials, Dental School, University of Athens, Thivon 2, 115 27 Athens, GREECE, Fax: +3102107240633

Dental School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Statement of problem

Different types of investment materials affect the formation of a surface contamination zone within commercially pure titanium (cpTi) castings. This contamination zone may possibly alter the mechanical properties of cast titanium, which may be problematic for castings used in the fabrication of removable and fixed prostheses.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different types of investments on the extent of contamination zone and the modulus of elasticity, yield strength, elongation, and hardness of cpTi castings.

Material and methods

Forty wax patterns were fabricated according to ISO 9693 for tensile testing. The patterns were divided into 2 groups of 20 patterns each, invested, and cast in pairs using cpTi. The first group (P) was invested with a phosphate-bonded silica-based investment material (Ticoat S+L), and the second group (M), with a magnesia-alumina investment material (Rematitan Ultra). Investment materials were examined by x-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). One specimen from each group was sectioned and prepared for metallographic observation. The extent of the contamination zone was determined by scanning electron microscopy, using back-scattering electron imaging and energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis, as well as microhardness testing. The tensile strength of the specimens was determined in a universal testing machine. From the derived tensile curves, the modulus of elasticity, yield strength, and percentage elongation were calculated and statistically evaluated among the groups using the Student t test (α=.05). Three fractured specimens from each group were examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the mode of fracture.

Results

XRD analysis showed that silica and magnesia were the dominant phases of Ticoat S+L and Rematitan Ultra, respectively. The contamination zone was found to extend 50 to 80 μm for the P specimens and 15 to 20 μm for the M specimens. No significance difference was found for the modulus of elasticity (P=85 ± 11 GPa, M=79 ± 13 GPa), whereas significant differences were found for the yield strength (P=462 ± 48 MPa, M=321 ± 54 MPa; P<.001) and percentage elongation (P=12 ± 2, M=21 ± 7; P=.002) between the groups tested. The fracture mode was brittle externally and ductile internally for both groups.

Conclusions

According to the results of this study, the extent of the contamination zone as well as the yield strength and percentage elongation of the cpTi castings were significantly affected by the type of the investment material.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(05)00517-2

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.09.017

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 6 , Pages 539-548, December 2005