Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 6 , Pages 511-519 , December 2005

Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations

  • Pascal Magne, DMD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Don and Sybil Harrington Foundation Chair of Esthetic Dentistry
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Pascal Magne, University of Southern California, School of Dentistry, 925 West 34th Street, DEN 4366, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0641, Fax: 213-740-6778
    • ,
  • Tae Hyung Kim, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor
    • ,
  • Domenico Cascione, CDT

      Affiliations

    • Dental Technologist
    • ,
  • Terence E. Donovan, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Co-Chair, Director of Advanced Education in Prosthodontics

References 

  1. Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: part II—clinical results. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:9–18
  2. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure—a clinician's observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998;19:625–628630, 632
  3. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent. 1992;17:13–20
  4. McCabe JF, Rusby S. Dentine bonding—the effect of pre-curing the bonding resin. Br Dent J. 1994;176:333–336
  5. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: effect on bond strength. Am J Dent. 1996;9:115–119
  6. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Garberoglio R, Davidson CL. Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. Am J Dent. 1996;9:57–60
  7. Paul SJ, Scharer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:8–14
  8. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17:536–545
  9. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:1033–1042
  10. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent. 1999;24:147–155
  11. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:111–121
  12. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. J Dent. 2002;30:259–269
  13. Ozturk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:275–281
  14. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15:105–113
  15. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a “resin coating” on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent. 2003;28:28–35
  16. Magne P, Belser U. Immediate dentin bonding. In:  Magne P,  Belser U editor. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: a biomimetic approach. Chicago: Quintessence; 2002;p. 270–273358-63
  17. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17:144–155
  18. Johnson GH, Hazelton LR, Bales DJ, Lepe X. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:428–435
  19. Magne P, Perroud R, Hodges JS, Belser UC. Clinical performance of novel-design porcelain veneers for the recovery of coronal volume and length. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20:440–457
  20. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:503–509
  21. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22:241–249
  22. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res. 1999;78:699–705
  23. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2:99–116
  24. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215–235
  25. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, et al. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2003;16:414–420
  26. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1652–1658
  27. Park JW, Ferracane JL. Measuring the residual stress in dental composites using a ring slitting method. Dent Mater. 2005;21:882–889
  28. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6449–6459

PII: S0022-3913(05)00557-3

doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 6 , Pages 511-519 , December 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution