Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 95, Issue 4 , Pages 290-296 , April 2006

Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth

  • Clarisse C.H. Ng, BDSc

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Graduate Prosthodontics
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to:Dr Clarisse Ng, Baylor College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Ave., Rm. 304, Dallas, TX 75246, Fax: 1-214-874-4544
  • ,
  • Herman B. Dumbrigue, DDM

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor; Assistant Program Director, Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency Program
  • ,
  • Manal I. Al-Bayat, BDS

      Affiliations

    • Private practice, Saudi Arabia; former Resident, Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency Program
  • ,
  • Jason A. Griggs, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor; Graduate Program Director, Biomaterials Science
  • ,
  • Charles W. Wakefield, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Professor; Program Director, Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency Program

References 

  1. Spear F. When to restore, when to remove: the single debilitated tooth. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999;20:316–328
  2. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed.. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1997;p. 89
  3. Christensen GJ. When to use fillers, build-ups or posts and cores. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:1397–1398
  4. Qualtrough AJ, Mannocci F. Tooth-colored post systems: a review. Oper Dent. 2003;28:86–91
  5. Turner CH. The utilization of roots to carry post-retained crowns. J Oral Rehabil. 1982;9:193–202
  6. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:780–784
  7. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:631–636
  8. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. 8th ed. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:38.
  9. Sorensen JA, Engleman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:529–536
  10. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995;8:155–161
  11. Ng CC, Al-Bayat MI, Dumbrigue HB, Griggs JA, Wakefield CW. Effect of no ferrule on failure of teeth restored with bonded posts and cores. Gen Dent. 2004;52:143–146
  12. Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:78–82
  13. Milot P, Stein RS. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:428–435
  14. Patel A, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro investigation of cast post and partial core design. J Dent. 1996 Jul;24:281–287
  15. Al-Hazaimeh N, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro study into the effect of the ferrule preparation on the fracture resistance of crowned teeth incorporating prefabricated post and composite core restorations. Int Endod J. 2001;34:40–46
  16. Morgan LF, Montgomery S. An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless technique. J Endod. 1984;10:491–498
  17. Loney RW, Moulding MB, Ritsco RG. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995;8:247–251
  18. Cooney JP, Caputo AA, Trabert KC. Retention and stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:540–546
  19. Pallis K, Griggs JA, Woody RD, Guillen GE, Miller AW. Fracture resistance of three all ceramic restorative systems for posterior applications. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:561–569
  20. Volwiler RA, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. Comparison of three core buildup materials used in conjunction with two post systems in endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Endod. 1989;15:355–361
  21. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont. 2001;10:26–36

 This paper was presented at the 34th Annual Session of the American College of Prosthodontists, October 2004, Ottawa, Canada, and received 2nd place in the John J. Sharry Prosthodontic Research Competition.This study was partially funded by NIH-NIDCR grant DE 13358.

PII: S0022-3913(06)00108-9

doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.026

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 95, Issue 4 , Pages 290-296 , April 2006