Fixed prosthesis with a milled bar for correcting misangled implants: A clinical report

References 

1. Balshi TJ, Ekfeldt A, Stenberg T, Vrielinck L. Three-year evaluation of Branemark implants connected to angulated abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:52–58
   • MEDLINE
2. Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P, Axmann-Krcmar D, Chanavaz M. Evolution of the concept of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: 14-year clinical data. Implant Dent. 2002;11:41–51
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
3. Lima Verde MA, Morgano SM, Hashem A. Technique to restore unfavorably inclined implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:359–363
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (737 KB)
   • CrossRef
4. Brudvik JS, Chigurupati K. The milled implant bar: an alternative to spark erosion. J Can Dent Assoc. 2002;68:485–488
5. Ercoli C, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Hagan ME. Alternative procedure for making a metal superstructure in a milled bar implant-supported overdenture. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:253–258
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (187 KB)
   • CrossRef
6. Eisenmann E, Mokabberi A, Walter MH, Freesmeyer WB. Improving the fit of implant supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:810–818
7. Besimo C, Jeger C, Guggenheim R. Marginal adaptation of titanium frameworks produced by CAD/CAM techniques. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:541–546
   • MEDLINE
8. Galindo DF. The implant-supported milled-bar mandibular overdenture. J Prosthodont. 2001;10:46–51
   • MEDLINE
9. Jemt T. Three-dimensional distortion of gold alloy casting and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:557–564