Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 76, Issue 3 , Pages 250-253 , September 1996

In vivo resin-dentin interdiffusion and tag formation with lateral branches of two adhesive systems

  • Marco Ferrari, MD, DDS, PhD (Clinical Professor of Restorative Dentistry)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr. Marco Ferrari P.za Attlas 19 Livorno 57125 Italy
    • University of Siena Siena, Italy
  • ,
  • Carel Leon Davidson, PhD (Professor and Chairman)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials Sciences, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands

References 

  1. Soderhülm KJ. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASC MD 156 Task Group on Test Methods for the adhesion of restorative materials. Dent Mater. 1991;7:74–83
  2. Asmussen E, Munksgaard EC. Adhesion of restorative resins to dentinal tissue. In:  Vanherle G,  Smith DC editor. Posterior composite resin dental materials. Utrecht: Peter Zule; 1987;p. 121–123
  3. Bowen RL, Matjenhoff WA. Development of an adhesive bonding system. Oper Dent. 1992;17(suppl 5):75–80
  4. Nordenvall KJ, Brännström M. In vivo resin impregnation of dentinal tubules. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;44:630–637
  5. Prati C, Pashley DH, Montanari G. Hydrostatic intrapulpar pressure and bond strength of bonding systems. Dent Mater. 1991;7:54–58
  6. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1530–1540
  7. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1396–1399
  8. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Structural evidence of a sealed tissue interface with a total etch wet-bonding technique in vivo. J Dent Res. 1994;73:629–636
  9. Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P, Eick JD. Dentinal tubule anastomosis: a potential factor in adhesive bonding?. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:183–188
  10. Chigira H, Yukitami W, Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Hayakawa T, et al. Self-etching dentin primers containing phenyl-P. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1088–1095
  11. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1212–1220
  12. Cagdiaco MC, Ferrari M. In:  De Batte O editors. Bonding to dentin. 1995;p. 113–120 IF Livorno
  13. Watanabe I. Photocure bonding agents to ground dentin. Jpn J Dent Mater. 1992;11:955–973
  14. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PT. Laboratory evaluation of an experimental dental adhesive system [abstract]. J Dent Res. 1994;73:199
  15. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Harner JA, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer [abstract]. J Dent Res. 1994;73:276
  16. Gwinnett AJ. Quantitative contribution of resin infiltration/hybridization to dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 1993;6:7–9
  17. Schnuepbach P, Krejci I, Lutz F. The resin dentin hybrid layer: comparative SEM, TEM and confocal microscopic examination [abstract]. J Dent Res. 1994;73:107
  18. Bouillaguet S, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Pashley DH. Influence of dentin thickness and region on tensile bond strengh [abstract]. J Dent Res. 1994;73:296
  19. Garberoglio R, Brännström M. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Biol. 1976;21:355–362
  20. Walshaw PR, Mc Comb D. SEM evaluation of the resin-dentin interface with proprietary bonding agents in human subjects. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1079–1087

PII: S0022-3913(96)90167-5

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 76, Issue 3 , Pages 250-253 , September 1996