This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic DentistryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Maximum acceptable concentrations. A comparison in Russia and the United States.Arch Environ Health. 1961; 2: 45
- Mercury surveys in dental offices.J Am Dent Assoc. 1974; 89: 900
- Kentucky dental mercury survey.J Ky Dent Assoc. 1979; 31: 23
- Mercury survey of dental offices in Iowa City and Cedar Rapids.Iowa Dent J. 1980; 66: 38
- Recommendations in mercury hygiene.J Am Dent Assoc. 1976; 92: 1217
- Twelve dental mercury devices: An evaluation of methods of monitoring, containment, and removal of mercury.Oper Dent. 1980; 5: 72
- Mercury vapor emitted during ultraspeed cutting of amalgam.J Indiana Dent Assoc. 1978; 57: 28
- Systemic mercury levels caused by inhaling mist during high-speed amalgam grinding.J Oral Med. 1973; 28: 100
- Mercury vapor expired after restorative treatment: Preliminary study.J Dent Res. 1979; 58: 2005
- Mercury in the Expired Breath of Dental Patients.in: ed 7. Thesis. University of Iowa, 1979
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 1983 The C. V. Mosby Company. Published by Elsevier Inc.
