Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

A risk assessment treatment planning protocol for the four implant immediately loaded maxilla: preliminary findings

      Statement of problem

      There is debate as to the efficacy of maxillary complete arch reconstructions when only 4 implants are used.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this study was to determine what risk factors, if any, may increase the likelihood for implant failure in immediate function by using a tilted distal, 4-implant approach in the maxilla.

      Material and methods

      A retrospective analysis of implant performance was conducted for patients treated with 4 implants placed in 285 maxillae (1140 implants) and 273 mandibles (992 implants) providing immediate function for complete arch implant-supported prostheses. The consecutively treated patient cohort consisted of those who provided consent between April 2008 and December 2010. A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess potential maxillary implant failure factors, including a history of smoking, gender, opposing occlusion, bone density, bone volume, insertion torque, parafunction, failed implant site, addiction, and systemic factors. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. A series of risk factors were postulated in an effort to establish guidelines for modification of treatment planning protocols in response to combined risks.

      Results

      Several common primary factors in maxillary implant failure scenarios were identified through this process of patient profiling. Opposing natural dentition, male gender, lack of bone density, the distal implant site, and parafunction were sufficiently frequent occurrences in failure situations to suggest that either the use of additional implants or delayed loading and the provision of a complete denture as an interim prosthesis may be more appropriate in the management of patients identified as being high risk. Secondary factors such as bone availability (volume) and smoking were less common in failure situations.

      Conclusions

      A preliminary protocol is suggested for both treatment planning and profiling patients with respect to presenting characteristics that may contribute to implant failure. A decrease in failure occurrence has been noted anecdotally during the short term implementation of this protocol.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Balshi TJ
        • Wolfinger GJ
        Immediate loading of Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles: a preliminary report.
        Implant Dent. 1997; 6: 83-88
        • Chiapasco M
        Early and immediate restoration and loading of implants in completely edentulous patients.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 76-91
        • Schnitman PA
        • Wöhrle PS
        • Rubenstein JE
        • DaSilva JD
        • Wang NH
        Ten-year results for Brånemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses at implant placement.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12: 495-503
        • Randow K
        • Ericsson I
        • Nilner K
        • Peterson A
        • Glantz O
        Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999; 10: 8-15
        • Tarnow DP
        • Emtiaz S
        • Classi A
        Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: ten consecutive case reports with 1- to 5-year data.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12: 319-324
        • Degidi M
        • Piattelli A
        Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods with a follow-up of up to 24 months.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 99-107
        • Gapski R
        • Wang HL
        • Mascarenhas P
        • Lang NP
        Critical review of immediate implant loading.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14: 515-527
        • Tortamano P
        • Orii TC
        • Yamanochi J
        • Nakamae AE
        • Guarnieri Tde C
        Outcomes of fixed prostheses supported by immediately loaded endosseous implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 63-70
        • Esposito M
        • Grusovin MG
        • Willings M
        • Coulthard P
        • Worthington HV
        The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22: 893-904
        • Ericsson I
        • Randow K
        • Nilner K
        • Peterson A
        Early functional loading of Brånemark dental implants: 5 year follow-up study.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000; 2: 70-77
        • Chiapasco M
        • Abati S
        • Romeo E
        • Vogel G
        Implant-retained madibular overdentures with Brånemark System MKII implants: a prospective comparative study between delayed and immediate loading.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 537-546
        • Rangert B
        • Jemt T
        • Jorneus L
        Forces and moments on Brånemark Implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989; 4: 241-247
        • Brånemark P-I
        • Svensson B
        • van Steenberghe D
        Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants admodum Branemark in full edentulism.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995; 6: 227-231
        • Maló P
        • Rangert B
        • Nobre M
        “All-on-Four” immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003; 5: 2-9
        • Calandriello R
        • Tomatis M
        Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate/early function and tilted implants: a prospective 1-year clinical study.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005; 7: S1-12
        • Chee W
        • Jivrai S
        Efficiency of immediately loaded mandibular full-arch implant restorations.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003; 5: 52-56
        • Krekmanov L
        • Kahn M
        • Rangert B
        • Lindström H
        Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants of improved prosthesis support.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15: 405-414
        • Aparicio C
        • Perales P
        • Rangert B
        Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting; a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001; 3: 39-49
        • Fortin Y
        • Sullivan RM
        • Rangert BR
        The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002; 4: 69-77
        • Cooper LF
        • Rahman A
        • Moriarty J
        • Chaffee N
        • Sacco D
        Immediate mandibular rehabilitation with endosseous implants: simultaneous extraction, implant placement, and loading.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 517-525
        • Calandriello R
        • Tomatis M
        Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via early/immediate function and tilted implants: a prospective 1-year clinical study.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005; 7: 1-12
        • Malo P
        • Rangert B
        • Nobre M
        All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005; 7: 88-94
        • Mattsson T
        • Köndell PA
        • Gynther GW
        • Fredholm U
        • Bolin A
        Implant treatment without bone grafting in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57: 281-287
        • Balshe AB
        • Eckert SE
        • Koka S
        • Assad DA
        • Weaver AL
        The effects of smoking on the survival of smooth- and rough-surface implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 1117-1122