Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Effect of die spacer thickness on shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers

      Statement of problem

      The application of die spacer may affect the shear bond strength (SBS) of porcelain laminate veneer (PLV). However, there is no standard for the amount of die spacer necessary for the fabrication of PLV restorations.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SBS differences between enamel and a feldspathic PLV as a function of die spacer thickness.

      Material and methods

      Eighty rectangular (5 × 3 × 1 mm) PLV (Super Porcelain EX-3) specimens were made using stone blocks on which die spacer (Nice Fit) was applied in different thicknesses (0, 2, 4, or 6 coats) (n=20). Before bonding, all PLV specimens were pretreated with airborne-particle abrasion (1-, 2-, 3-, or 4-bar pressure; 10 sec/10-mm distance or 5 sec/20-mm distance) and cleaned with an ultrasonic cleanser. A vertically flat surface on the labial enamel of 80 freshly extracted sound teeth was prepared with a low-speed diamond-coated saw. The PLV specimens were bonded to the etched enamel specimens using a composite resin cement (RelyX Veneer). Forty enamel-ceramic specimens (Group NTc) were maintained in deionized water at room temperature for 1 week after cementation, and the other 40 specimens (Group Tc) were subjected to thermal cycling treatment (2500 cycles, 5°C to 60°C, 15-second dwell time). The SBS measurement was performed with a universal testing machine. The results were compared with a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and mean values were compared with Fisher's Protected Least Significant Difference (PLSD) intervals (α=.05).

      Results

      For Group NTc specimens, the SBS values (MPa) were 8.7 ± 2.6 (no coat), 12.6 ± 4.8 (2 coats), 10.7 ± 2.9 (4 coats), and 9.6 ± 2.8 (6 coats). For Group Tc specimens, the SBS values were 4.1 ± 2.0 (no coat), 7.1 ± 3.4 (2 coats), 6.8 ± 2.1 (4 coats), and 6.1 ± 2.4 (6 coats). Two-way ANOVA showed that the SBS was influenced by the thermal cycling and the number of coats, but there was no significant interaction between the 2 variables. The Fisher's PLSD interval for the SBS for comparisons among the number of coats was 0.95. The group with 2 coats of die spacer showed higher SBS values than the group with no coat, whereas groups with more than 2 coats of die spacer resulted in similar SBS values when compared to each other. The thermal cycling treatment resulted in a significant decrease of the SBS. Group Tc showed a trend similar to Group NTc.

      Conclusion

      Within the limitations of this study it was found that the appropriate application of die spacer exerts a favorable influence on the SBS of composite-bonded PLV. The 2-coat application of die spacer provides suitable space to accommodate the cement thickness.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Troedson M.
        • Derand T.
        Effect of margin design, cement polymerization, and angle of loading on stress in porcelain veneers.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82: 518-524
        • Christensen G.J.
        The state of the art in esthetic restorative dentistry.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1997; 128: 1315-1317
        • Christensen G.J.
        Veneering of teeth. State of the art.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1985; 29: 373-391
        • Eames W.B.
        • O'Neal S.J.
        • Monteiro J.
        • Miller C.
        • Roan Jr., J.D.
        • Cohen K.S.
        Techniques to improve the seating of castings.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1978; 96: 432-437
        • Kern M.
        • Thompson V.P.
        Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 453-461
        • Llobell A.
        • Nicholls J.I.
        • Kois J.C.
        • Daly C.H.
        Fatigue life of porcelain repair systems.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1992; 5: 205-213
        • Shillingburg H.T.
        • Sumiya H.
        • Whitsett L.D.
        • Jacobi R.
        • Brackett S.
        Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics.
        3rd ed. Quintessence, Chicago1997 (p. 378, 433)
        • Psillakis J.J.
        • McAlarney M.E.
        • Wright R.F.
        • Urquiola J.
        • MacDonal D.E.
        Effect of evaporation and mixing technique on die spacer thickness: a preliminary study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85: 82-87
        • Wang C.J.
        • Millstein P.L.
        • Nathanson D.
        Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67: 786-790
        • Carter S.M.
        • Wilson P.R.
        The effects of die-spacing on post-cementation crown elevation and retention.
        Aust Dent J. 1997; 42: 192-198
        • Campagni W.V.
        • Preston J.D.
        • Reisbick M.H.
        Measurement of paint-on die spacers used for casting relief.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 47: 606-611
        • Rieger M.R.
        • Tanquist R.A.
        • Brose M.O.
        • Ali M.
        Measuring the thickness of a paint-on die spacer.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 58: 305-308
        • Oliva R.A.
        • Lowe J.A.
        Effect of die spacer on the seating of cast restorations on composite core preparations.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 58: 29-35
        • Grajower R.
        • Lewinstein I.
        • Zelster C.
        The effective minimum cement thickness of zinc phosphate cement for luted non-precious crowns.
        J Oral Rehabil. 1985; 12: 235-245
        • Anusavice K.J.
        • Phillips R.W.
        Phillips' science of dental materials.
        11th ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia2003 (p. 316-8)
        • Campbell S.D.
        Comparison of conventional paint-on die spacers and those used with the all-ceramic restorations.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 151-155
        • Magne P.
        • Dent M.
        • Kwon K.A.
        • Belser U.C.
        Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: a simulated operatory evaluation.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 327-334
        • Cura C.
        • Saracoglu A.
        • Cotert H.S.
        Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 394-399
      1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 11405:2003: Dental materials—testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Available at: http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prods-services/ISOstore/store.html. Accessed Feb. 1, 2005.

        • Addison O.
        • Fleming G.
        • Marquis P.M.
        The effect of thermocycling on the strength of porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) materials.
        Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 291-297