Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Research Article| Volume 96, ISSUE 4, P237-244, October 2006

Download started.

Ok

The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide–based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: A prospective clinical pilot study

      Statement of problem

      Although zirconium-oxide–based restorations for fixed partial denture prostheses (FPDPs) are available for use, clinical studies evaluating their longevity and related complications have not been published.

      Purpose

      The aim of this pilot clinical study was to assess the efficacy of zirconia-based posterior 3-unit FPDPs.

      Material and methods

      Twenty 3-unit posterior FPDPs (Lava) were placed in 16 subjects who were missing a second premolar or a first molar, met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and provided informed consent. All teeth were prepared in a standardized manner: occlusal reduction of 1.5 to 2 mm; axial reduction of 1 to 1.5 mm; a 1.0-mm, 360-degree rounded shoulder placed 0.5 mm subgingivally on the facial aspect and supragingivally on the lingual aspect on sound tooth structure; and rounded internal line angles. Impressions were made with vinyl polysiloxane (Express) impression material. Frameworks were fabricated using a computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing technique with a retainer thickness of 0.6 mm, and a minimal connector surface area of 9 mm2. Restorations were luted with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Rely X luting). Recall appointments were made after 2 weeks and 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. Clinical fracture resistance, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, radiographic proximal recurrent decay, and periapical pathoses were assessed over time using modified Ryge criteria. The probability distributions of these variables were calculated for the baseline data as well as for recall data.

      Results

      Mean follow-up was 31.2 months. Fifteen restorations were rated Alpha in all measured parameters. Minor chipping of veneering porcelain was detected in 5 restorations rated Bravo for clinical fracture resistance and Alpha for all other assessed parameters. One restoration was rated Bravo in terms of marginal integrity at 36 months.

      Conclusions

      Zirconia-based posterior 3-unit FPDPs performed well after short-term service.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Probster L.
        Four year clinical study of glass-infiltrated, sintered alumina crowns.
        J Oral Rehabil. 1996; 23: 147-151
        • Fradeani M.
        • Redemagni M.
        An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns: a retrospective study.
        Quintessence Int. 2002; 33: 503-510
        • Oden A.
        • Andersson M.
        • Krystek-Ondracek I.
        • Magnusson D.
        Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 450-456
        • Odman P.
        • Andersson B.
        Procera Allceram crowns followed for 5 to 10.5 years: a prospective clinical study.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 504-509
        • Fradeani M.
        • D'Amelio M.
        • Redemagni M.
        • Corrado M.
        Five-year follow-up with Procera all-ceramic crowns.
        Quintessence Int. 2005; 36: 105-113
        • Denry I.L.
        • Holloway J.A.
        • Rosenstiel S.F.
        Effect of ion exchange on the microstructure, strength, and thermal expansion behavior of a leucite-reinforced porcelain.
        J Dent Res. 1998; 77: 583-588
        • Walton T.R.
        An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: part 1. Outcome.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15: 439-445
        • Drummond J.L.
        Ceramic behavior under different environmental and loading conditions.
        in: Eliades G. Eliades T. Brantley W.A. Watts D.C. Dental materials in vivo: aging and related phenomena. Quintessence, Chicago2003: 35-45
        • Raigrodski A.J.
        • Chiche G.J.
        The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 520-525
        • Sorensen J.A.
        • Kang S.A.
        • Torres T.J.
        • Knode H.
        In-Ceram fixed partial dentures: three-year clinical trial results.
        J Calif Dent Assoc. 1998; 26: 207-214
        • Vult von Steyern P.
        • Jonsson O.
        • Nilner K.
        Five-year evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three-unit (In-Ceram) FPDs.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 379-384
        • Olsson K.G.
        • Furst B.
        • Andersson B.
        • Carlsson G.E.
        A long-term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16: 150-156
        • Suarez M.J.
        • Lozano J.F.
        • Paz Salido M.
        • Martinez F.
        Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 35-38
        • Esquivel-Upshaw J.F.
        • Anusavice K.J.
        • Young H.
        • Jones J.
        • Gibbs C.
        Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 469-475
        • Raigrodski A.J.
        Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 557-562
        • Sorensen J.A.
        The Lava system for CAD/CAM production of high-strength precision fixed Prosthodontics.
        Quintessence Dent Technol. 2003; 26: 57-67
        • Piconi C.
        • Maccauro G.
        Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial.
        Biomaterials. 1999; 20: 1-25
        • Tinschert J.
        • Natt G.
        • Mautsch W.
        • Augthun M.
        • Spiekermann H.
        Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 231-238
        • Ichikawa Y.
        • Akagawa Y.
        • Nikai H.
        • Tsuru H.
        Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 322-326
        • Covacci V.
        • Bruzzese N.
        • Maccauro G.
        • Andreassi C.
        • Ricci G.A.
        • Piconi C.
        • et al.
        In vitro evaluation of the mutagenic and carcinogenic power of high purity zirconia ceramic.
        Biomaterials. 1999; 20: 371-376
        • Josset Y.
        • Oum'Hamed Z.
        • Zarrinpour A.
        • Lorenzato M.
        • Adnet J.J.
        • Laurent-Maquin D.
        In vitro reactions of human osteoblasts in culture with zirconia alumina ceramics.
        J Biomed Mater Res. 1999; 47: 481-493
        • Scarano A.
        • Piattelli M.
        • Caputi S.
        • Favero G.A.
        • Piattelli A.
        Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study.
        J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 292-296
        • Rimondini L.
        • Cerroni L.
        • Carrassi A.
        • Torricelli P.
        Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 793-798
        • Ernst C.P.
        • Cohnen U.
        • Stender E.
        • Willershausen B.
        In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 551-558
        • White S.N.
        • Miklus V.G.
        • McLaren E.A.
        • Lang L.A.
        • Caputo A.A.
        Flexural strength of a layered zirconia and porcelain dental all-ceramic system.
        J Prosthetic Dent. 2005; 94: 125-131
        • Christel P.
        • Meunier A.
        • Heller M.
        • Torre J.P.
        • Peille C.N.
        Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia.
        J Biomed Mater Res. 1989; 23: 45-61
        • Luthardt R.G.
        • Holzhuter M.S.
        • Rudolph H.
        • Herold V.
        • Walter M.H.
        CAD/CAM-machining effects on Y-TZP zirconia.
        Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 655-662
        • Ryge G.
        Clinical criteria.
        Int Dent J. 1980; 30: 347-358
        • Shillingburg H.T.
        • Hobo S.
        • Whitsett L.D.
        • Jacobi R.
        • Brackett S.E.
        Treatment planning for the replacement of missing teeth.
        in: Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Quintessence, Chicago1997: 85-103
        • Little J.W.
        • Miller C.S.
        • Falace D.A.
        • Rhodus N.
        Pregnancy and breast-feeding.
        in: Dental management of the medically compromised patient. 6th ed. Mosby, St. Louis2002: 303-313