Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Research Article| Volume 98, ISSUE 2, P101-109, August 2007

Use of a porcelain color discrimination test to evaluate color difference formulas

      Statement of problem

      The natural tooth color space reported by a manufacturer may not represent the comprehensive spectrum of natural teeth for all population groups.


      The purpose of this study was to define a natural tooth color space within the Greater Buffalo, New York population and to compare that to the color space determined by a manufacturer.

      Material and methods

      Nine hundred and thirty-three maxillary central incisors (501 patients) were measured with a shade-taking device (Vita Easyshade). For each tooth, L*, a*, b* values, chroma, hue, and the closest shade (Vita 3D-Master) were recorded. A linear regression analysis was performed to determine how well the manufacturer's values predict actual values for L*, a*, and b*. Color differences (ΔE*) between the Buffalo population and the closest shade were also calculated. A 1-sample t test was used to determine whether the color differences seen in the sample were statistically different from the perceptibility threshold, ΔE*=3.7 (a=.05).


      All 3 attributes of the Buffalo population displayed a broader range than those from the shade guide. However, the regression analysis revealed a significantly positive relationship between the L*, a*, and b* values of the 2 methods (P<.001). The 1-sample t test revealed a significant ΔE* (mean ΔE*=6.15) difference from the perceptibility threshold of ΔE*=3.7 (P<.001).


      Color differences between the Buffalo population and the shade guide were frequently above published perceptibility thresholds, but within the range of acceptability. The Buffalo population tooth color space encompassed the manufacturer's color space.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Watson JF
        • Crispin BJ
        Margin placement of esthetic veneer crowns. Part III: Attitudes of patients and dentists.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45: 499-501
        • Carlsson GE
        • Wagner IV
        • Odman P
        • Ekstrand K
        • MacEntee M
        • Marinello C
        • et al.
        An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer-aided image manipulation.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11: 246-254
        • Davis LG
        • Ashworth PD
        • Spriggs LS
        Psychological effects of asethetic dental treatment.
        J Dent. 1998; 26: 547-554
        • Clark EB
        The color problem in dentistry.
        Dent Dig. 1931; 37: 499-509
        • Preston JD
        Current status of shade selection and color matching.
        Quintessence Int. 1985; 16: 47-58
        • Milleding P
        • Haag P
        • Neroth B
        • Renz I
        Two years of clinical experience with Procera titanium crowns.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11: 224-232
        • Bergman B
        • Nilson H
        • Andersson M
        A longitudinal clinical study of Procera ceramic-veneered titanium copings.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12: 135-139
        • Sjogren G
        • Lantto R
        • Tillberg A
        Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns (Dicor) in general practice.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 277-284
        • Haselton DR
        • Diaz-Arnold AM
        • Hillis SL
        Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83: 396-401
        • Johnston WM
        • O'Brien WJ
        • Tien TY
        The determination of optical absorption and scattering in translucent porcelain.
        Color Res Appl. 1986; 11: 125-130
        • Wee AG
        • Chen WY
        • Johnston WM
        Color formulation and reproduction of opaque dental ceramic.
        Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 665-670
        • Judd DB
        • Wyszecki G
        Color in business, science, and industry. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York1975: 27-40
        • Paravina RD
        • Powers JM
        Esthetic color training in dentistry. Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis2004: 25
        • CIE
        Colorimetry. 2nd ed. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna1986: 33
        • Berger-Schunn A
        Practical color measurement: a primer for the beginner, a reminder for the expert. New York. John Wiley & Sons, New York1994: 42 (166.)
      1. CIE. Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color difference equations, psychometric color terms. Supplement No 2. CIE Publication No. 15 (E-13-1),1971 (TC-1.3) Paris: Bureau Central de la CIE, 1978.

        • Luo MR
        • Cui G
        • Rigg B
        The development of the CIE colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000.
        Color Res Appl. 2001; 26: 340-350
        • Kuehni RG
        • Marcus RT
        An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences.
        Color Res Appl. 1979; 4: 83-91
        • Seghi RR
        • Hewlett ER
        • Kim J
        Visual and instrument colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain.
        J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 1760-1764
        • Ragain JC
        • Johnston WM
        Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers.
        Color Res and Appl. 2000; 25: 278-285
        • Ruyter IE
        • Nilner K
        • Moller B
        Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers.
        Dent Mater. 1987; 3: 246-251
        • Johnston WM
        • Kao EC
        Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry.
        J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 819-822
        • Bolt RA
        • Bosch JJ
        • Coops JC
        Influence of Window Size in Small-Window Color Measurement, Particularly of Teeth.
        Phys Med Biol. 1994; 39: 1133-1142
        • Dawson-Saunders B
        • Trapp RG
        Basic and clinical biostatistics. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY2004: 314-316
        • Gozalo-Diaz DJ
        • Lindsey DT
        • Johnston WM
        • Wee AG
        Measurement of color for craniofacial structures using a 45/0-degree optical configuration.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97: 45-53
        • Hardy LH
        • Rand G
        • Rittler MC
        AO H-R-R Pseudoisochromatic Plates. 2nd ed. American Optical Co, New York1957: 12-32