Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Accuracy of friction-style and spring-style mechanical torque limiting devices for dental implants

      Statement of problem

      Accurate delivery of torque to implant prosthetic screws is critical to generate ideal preload in the screw joint and offer protection against screw loosening. Mechanical torque limiting devices (MTLDs) are available in 2 different styles that have not been compared for accuracy.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of friction-style and spring-style MTLDs in delivering target torque values.

      Material and methods

      Five MTLDs from each of 6 different implant manufacturers (n=30) were selected to determine their accuracy relative to their target torque values. All MTLDs were new; 3 types were of the friction style while 3 were of the spring style. To measure the output of each MTLD, a digital torque gauge with a 3-jaw chuck to hold the driver was used. Force was applied to the MTLD until either the friction style released at a precalibrated torque value or the spring style flexed to a precalibrated limit. The peak torque value registered by the digital torque gauge was recorded and the procedure was repeated 50 times for each MTLD. Statistical analysis used repeated-measures ANOVA (α=.05) to assess the accuracy of the MTLDs in delivering target torque values.

      Results

      Both the mean absolute difference (ABSDIFF) and the mean percentage deviation (PERDEV) between measured torque values and target torque values differed significantly (P<.001) for the friction-style MTLDs (3.83 Ncm, 13.74%) and for the spring-style MTLDs (0.82 Ncm, 2.36%).

      Conclusions

      Within the limitations of this study, MTLDs that use spring-style components are significantly more accurate than those that use friction-style components in achieving their target torque values. (J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:86-92)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jemt T
        Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991; 6: 270-276
        • Jemt T
        • Laney WR
        • Harris D
        • Henry PJ
        • Krogh Jr, PH
        • Polizzi G
        • et al.
        Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991; 6: 29-36
        • Naert I
        • Quirynen M
        • van Steenberghe D
        • Darius P
        A six-year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67: 236-245
        • Zarb GA
        • Schmitt A
        The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64: 185-194
        • Dellinges M
        • Curtis D
        Effects of infection control procedures on the accuracy of a new mechanical torque wrench system for implant restorations.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75: 93-98
        • Jörnéus L
        • Jemt T
        • Carlsson L
        Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7: 353-359
        • Budynas RG
        • Nisbett JK
        Shigley's mechanical engineering design. 8th ed. McGraw Hill, New York2008: 425-429
        • Haack JE
        • Sakaguchi RL
        • Sun T
        • Coffey JP
        Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10: 529-536
        • Patterson EA
        • Johns RB
        Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7: 26-33
        • McGlumphy EA
        • Mendel DA
        • Holloway JA
        Implant screw mechanics.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1998; 42: 71-89
        • Standlee JP
        • Caputo AA
        • Chwu MY
        • Sun TT
        Accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting devices for implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 220-224
        • Tan KB
        • Nicholls JI
        Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 367-377
        • Breeding LC
        • Dixon DL
        • Nelson EW
        • Tietge JD
        Torque required to loosen single-tooth implant abutment screws before and after simulated function.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1993; 6: 435-439
        • Cantwell A
        • Hobkirk JA
        Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 124-132
        • Rangert B
        • Jemt T
        • Jörneus L
        Forces and moments on Branemark implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989; 4: 241-247
        • Burguete RL
        • Johns RB
        • King T
        • Patterson EA
        Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 592-599
        • Byrne D
        • Jacobs S
        • O'Connell B
        • Houston F
        • Claffey N
        Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
        J Prosthodont. 2006; 15: 164-171
        • Goheen KL
        • Vermilyea SG
        • Vossoughi J
        • Agar JR
        Torque generated by handheld screwdrivers and mechanical torquing devices for osseointegrated implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9: 149-155
        • Dellinges MA
        • Tebrock OC
        A measurement of torque values obtained with hand-held drivers in a simulated clinical setting.
        J Prosthodont. 1993; 2: 212-214
        • Jaarda MJ
        • Razzoog ME
        • Gratton DG
        Providing optimum torque to implant prostheses: a pilot study.
        Implant Dent. 1993; 2: 50-52
        • Tan KB
        • Nicholls JI
        The effect of 3 torque delivery systems on gold screw preload at the gold cylinder-abutment screw joint.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 175-183
        • Cehreli MC
        • Akça K
        • Tönük E
        Accuracy of a manual torque application device for morse-taper implants: a technical note.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 743-748
        • Gutierrez J
        • Nicholls JI
        • Libman WJ
        • Butson TJ
        Accuracy of the implant torque wrench following time in clinical service.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1997; 10: 562-567
        • Mitrani R
        • Nicholls JI
        • Phillips KM
        • Ma T
        Accuracy of electronic implant torque controllers following time in clinical service.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 394-399
        • Standlee JP
        • Caputo AA
        Accuracy of an electric torque-limiting device for implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 278-281