Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Dental Technique| Volume 113, ISSUE 6, P509-515, June 2015

Use of intraoral digital scanning for a CAD/CAM-fabricated milled bar and superstructure framework for an implant-supported, removable complete dental prosthesis

      Abstract

      This report describes a clinical technique for fabricating a maxillary implant-supported, removable complete dental prosthesis by using an intraoral digital scanner to register implant positions and soft tissue morphology. The presented technique uses computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology with a subtractive manufacturing process to fabricate a milled bar (infrastructure framework) and an additive process to fabricate a friction fit, superstructure framework. This digital restorative pathway may decrease patient discomfort and reduce the labor associated with fabricating implant-supported, removable complete dental prostheses.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sadowsky S.J.
        • Fitzpatrick B.
        • Curtis D.A.
        Evidence-based criteria for differential treatment planning of implant restorations for the maxillary edentulous patient.
        J Prosthodont. 2014 Oct 13; (http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12226. [Epub ahead of print])
        • Raghoebar G.M.
        • Meijer H.J.
        • Slot W.
        • Slater J.J.
        • Vissink A.
        A systematic review of implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous maxilla, compared to the mandible: how many implants?.
        Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014; 7: S191-S201
        • Slot W.
        • Raghoebar G.M.
        • Vissink A.
        • Huddleston Slater J.J.
        • Meijer H.J.
        A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2010; 37: 98-110
        • Sadowsky S.J.
        Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic review.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97: 340-348
        • Osman R.B.
        • Payne A.G.
        • Ma S.
        Prosthodontic maintenance of maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic literature review.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2012; 25: 381-391
        • Bueno-Samper A.
        • Hernández-Aliaga M.
        • Calvo-Guirado J.L.
        The implant-supported milled bar overdenture: a literature review.
        Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15: e375-e378
        • Andreiotelli M.
        • Kamposiora P.
        • Papavasiliou G.
        Digital data management for CAD/CAM technology. An update of current systems.
        Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2013; 21: 9-15
        • Drago C.
        • Howell K.
        Concepts for designing and fabricating metal implant frameworks for hybrid implant prostheses.
        J Prosthodont. 2012; 21: 413-424
        • Abduo J.
        • Lyons K.
        • Bennani V.
        • Waddell N.
        • Swain M.
        Fit of screw-retained fixed implant frameworks fabricated by different methods: a systematic review.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2011; 24: 207-220
        • van Noort R.
        The future of dental devices is digital.
        Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 3-12
        • Abduo J.
        • Lyons K.
        • Bennamoun M.
        Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams.
        Int J Dent. 2014; 2014: 783-798
        • Al Jabbari Y.S.
        • Koutsoukis T.
        • Barmpagadaki X.
        • Zinelis S.
        Metallurgical and interfacial characterization of PFM Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated via casting, milling or selective laser melting.
        Dent Mater. 2014; 30: e79-e88
        • Bidra A.S.
        • Taylor T.D.
        • Agar J.R.
        Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 361-366
        • Kattadiyil M.T.
        • Mursic Z.
        • AlRumaih H.
        • Goodacre C.J.
        Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 444-448
        • Lin W.S.
        • Harris B.T.
        • Zandinejad A.
        • Morton D.
        Use of digital data acquisition and CAD/CAM technology for the fabrication of a fixed complete dental prosthesis on dental implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111: 1-5
        • Lin W.S.
        • Harris B.T.
        • Metz M.J.
        • Morton D.
        A technique for verifying and correcting a milled polyurethane definitive cast for nonsegmental implant restoration in an edentulous jaw.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 658-662
        • Bindhoo Y.A.
        • Thirumurthy V.R.
        • Kurien A.
        Complete mucostatic impression: a new attempt.
        J Prosthodont. 2012; 21: 209-214