Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      Various zirconia abutment designs are available to restore implant systems. Fracture resistance is one of the criteria involved in selecting among these options.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure and compare load to failure for 5 zirconia abutments for an internally hexagon implant.

      Material and methods

      Five 4.1×11.5-mm Zimmer tapered screw-vent implants were individually secured in a loading apparatus, and 3 specimens of each of the 5 different abutments (Zimmer Contour with a Ti ring, anatomic-contour Atlantis-Zr, anatomic-contour Inclusive-Zr, anatomic-contour Astra Tech ZirDesign, Legacy Straight Contoured abutment with Ti core) (N=15) were loaded at a 30-degree angle until the implant abutment complex failed. Data for load to failure were compared with analysis of variance and a Tukey-Kramer post hoc test (α=.05).

      Results

      The custom anatomic-contour abutment (Inclusive) showed the lowest load to fracture, and the stock anatomic-contour (AstraTech ZirDesign) the second lowest load to fracture. These were significantly lower than all other abutments (P<.05). The highest overall fracture strength was of a zirconia abutment with a titanium core-hexagon (Legacy Straight Contoured), which was significantly greater than all other abutments (P<.05). Anatomic-contour zirconia abutments fractured at an average of 275 N compared with the average fracture load of 842 N for zirconia abutments with titanium component (P<.05).

      Conclusion

      The stock zirconia abutment with a titanium ring and the zirconia abutment with a titanium core-hexagon (Legacy Straight Contoured) had significantly greater fracture resistance than that of any of the 1-piece anatomic-contour zirconia abutments tested.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Watkin A.
        • Kerstein R.B.
        Improving darkened anterior peri-implant tissue color with zirconia custom implant abutments.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008; 29 (42): 238-240
        • Sailer I.
        • Sailer T.
        • Stawarczyk B.
        • Jung R.
        • Hammerle H.
        In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 850-858
        • Jung R.
        • Sailer I.
        • Hammerle C.
        • Attin T.
        • Schmidlin P.
        In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007; 27: 251-257
        • Klotz M.
        • Taylor T.
        • Goldberg A.
        Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26: 970-975
        • Stimmelmayr M.
        • Sagerer S.
        • Erdelt K.
        • Beuer F.
        In vitro fatigue and fracture strength testing of one-piece zirconia implant abutments and zirconia implant abutments connected to titanium cores.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28: 488-493
        • Att W.
        • Kurun S.
        • Gerds T.
        • Strub J.R.
        Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: An in vitro study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 111-116
        • Worni A.
        • Kolgeci L.
        • Rentsch-Kollar A.
        • Katsoulis J.
        • Mericske-Stern R.
        Zirconia-based screw-retained prostheses supported by implants: a retrospective study on technical complications and failures.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; (epub ahead of print)
        • Cavusoglu Y.
        • Akca K.
        • Gurbuz R.
        • Cehreli M.
        A pilot study of joint stability at the zirconium or titanium abutment/titanium implant interface.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 338-343
        • Zembic A.
        • Phillip A.
        • Hammerle C.
        • Wohlwend A.
        • Sailer I.
        Eleven-year follow-up of a prospective study of zirconia implant abutments supporting single all-ceramic crowns in anterior and premolar regions.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2 Sep 2014; ([ePub Ahead of Print])
        • Foong J.K.W.
        • Judge R.B.
        • Palamara J.E.
        • Swain M.V.
        Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 304-312
        • Stimmelmayr M.
        • Edelhoff D.
        • Guth J.F.
        • Erdelt K.
        • Happe A.
        • Beuer F.
        Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
        Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 1215-1220
        • Butz F.
        • Heydecke G.
        • Okutan M.
        • Strub J.
        Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation.
        J Oral Rehab. 2005; 32: 838-843
        • Nguyen H.Q.
        • Tan K.B.
        • Nicholls J.I.
        Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 636-646
        • Sui X.
        • Wei H.
        • Wang D.
        • Han Y.
        • Deng J.
        • Wang Y.
        • Wang J.
        • Yang J.
        Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
        J Dent. 2014; 42: 1353-1359
        • Thulasidas S.
        • Givan D.A.
        • Lemmons J.E.
        • O’Neal S.J.
        • Ramp L.C.
        • Liu P.R.
        Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
        J Prosthodont. 2015; 24: 127-135
        • Hartley H.O.
        • Rao J.N.K.
        Maximum-likelihood estimation for the mixed analysis of variance model.
        Biometrika. 1967; 54: 93-108
        • Ferrario V.F.
        • Sforza C.
        • Serrao G.
        • Dellavia C.
        • Tartaglia G.M.
        Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 18-22
        • Waltimo A.
        • Könönen M.
        Bite force on single as opposed to all maxillary front teeth.
        Scand J Dent Res. 1994; 102: 372-375
        • Gibbs C.H.
        • Anusavice K.J.
        • Young H.M.
        • Jones J.S.
        • Esquivel-Upshaw J.F.
        Maximum clenching force of patients with moderate loss of posterior tooth support: a pilot study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88: 498-502