Abstract
A digital process is presented for an implant-supported single-tooth and a 3-unit
fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) with customized abutments and monolithic prosthetic
zirconia restorations. The digital impression on the implant level was made with a
TRIOS intraoral scanner (3Shape). This process included the fabrication of an implant
cast with the fused deposition modeling technique and a 3-dimensional printing process
with integrated implant analogs. The process enabled the FDPs to be designed with
CAD/CAM on the cast before patient contact. Designing a printed implant cast expands
the use of the digital workflow in the dental field.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic DentistryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.J Prosthodont. 2015; 113: 304-309
- Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies.J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1432-1436
- A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 555-560
- Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations.Br Dent J. 2008; 204: 505-511
- Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 111-115
- The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone.J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 187-191
- The future of dental devices is digital.Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 3-12
- Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2 Sep 2014; ([Epub ahead of print])
- Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 1113-1118
- Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions–an in-vitro study.Int J Comput Dent. 2011; 14: 11-21
- Use of an intraoral laser scanner during the prosthetic phase of implant dentistry: a pilot study.J Oral Implantol. 2015; 41: e126-e132
- Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions.Int J Prosthodont. 2014; 27: 331-337
- Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012; 24: 299-308
- Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology.PloS One. 2012; 7: e43312
- Fabrication of implant overdentures that are passive and biocompatible.Implant Dent. 2000; 9: 96-101
- Prosthodontic management of implant therapy.Dent Clin North Am. 2014; 58: 207-225
- Prosthetic considerations.Aust Dent J. 2008; 53: S49-59
- Income, dental insurance coverage, and financial barriers to dental care among Canadian adults.J Public Health Dent. 2011; 71: 327-334
- Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: e54-e64
- Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30: 56-64
- Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 1304-1306
- Commentary. Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012; 24: 309
- Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis.J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1461-1471
- Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.J Am Dent Assoc. 2014; 145: 1133-1140
- The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study.J Am Dent Assoc. 2014; 145: 542-551
- Esthetic considerations for reconstructing implant emergence profile using titanium and zirconia custom implant abutments: fifty case series report.J Oral Implantol. 31 Oct 2013; ([Epub ahead of print])
Article info
Publication history
Published online: July 14, 2015
Identification
Copyright
© 2015 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
