Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Clinical Report| Volume 114, ISSUE 4, P469-473, October 2015

Download started.


Digital process for an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report


      A digital process is presented for an implant-supported single-tooth and a 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) with customized abutments and monolithic prosthetic zirconia restorations. The digital impression on the implant level was made with a TRIOS intraoral scanner (3Shape). This process included the fabrication of an implant cast with the fused deposition modeling technique and a 3-dimensional printing process with integrated implant analogs. The process enabled the FDPs to be designed with CAD/CAM on the cast before patient contact. Designing a printed implant cast expands the use of the digital workflow in the dental field.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Anadioti E.
        • Aquilino S.A.
        • Gratton D.G.
        • Holloway J.A.
        • Denry I.L.
        • Thomas G.W.
        • et al.
        Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
        J Prosthodont. 2015; 113: 304-309
        • Kim K.B.
        • Kim J.H.
        • Kim W.C.
        • Kim J.H.
        Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1432-1436
        • Ng J.
        • Ruse D.
        • Wyatt C.
        A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 555-560
        • Beuer F.
        • Schweiger J.
        • Edelhoff D.
        Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations.
        Br Dent J. 2008; 204: 505-511
        • Lee S.J.
        • Gallucci G.O.
        Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 111-115
        • Lin W.S.
        • Harris B.T.
        • Morton D.
        The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 187-191
        • van Noort R.
        The future of dental devices is digital.
        Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 3-12
        • Joda T.
        • Bragger U.
        Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2 Sep 2014; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Wismeijer D.
        • Mans R.
        • van Genuchten M.
        • Reijers H.A.
        Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 1113-1118
        • Ender A.
        • Mehl A.
        Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions–an in-vitro study.
        Int J Comput Dent. 2011; 14: 11-21
        • Lee C.Y.
        • Wong N.
        • Ganz S.D.
        • Mursic J.
        • Suzuki J.B.
        Use of an intraoral laser scanner during the prosthetic phase of implant dentistry: a pilot study.
        J Oral Implantol. 2015; 41: e126-e132
        • Tamim H.
        • Skjerven H.
        • Ekfeldt A.
        • Ronold H.J.
        Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2014; 27: 331-337
        • Ramsey C.D.
        • Ritter R.G.
        Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012; 24: 299-308
        • van der Meer W.J.
        • Andriessen F.S.
        • Wismeijer D.
        • Ren Y.
        Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology.
        PloS One. 2012; 7: e43312
        • Renner A.M.
        Fabrication of implant overdentures that are passive and biocompatible.
        Implant Dent. 2000; 9: 96-101
        • Thalji G.
        • Bryington M.
        • De Kok I.J.
        • Cooper L.F.
        Prosthodontic management of implant therapy.
        Dent Clin North Am. 2014; 58: 207-225
        • Mericske-Stern R.
        Prosthetic considerations.
        Aust Dent J. 2008; 53: S49-59
        • Locker D.
        • Maggirias J.
        • Quinonez C.
        Income, dental insurance coverage, and financial barriers to dental care among Canadian adults.
        J Public Health Dent. 2011; 71: 327-334
        • Gimenez B.
        • Ozcan M.
        • Martinez-Rus F.
        • Pradies G.
        Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: e54-e64
        • Gimenez B.
        • Pradies G.
        • Martinez-Rus F.
        • Ozcan M.
        Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30: 56-64
        • Joda T.
        • Bragger U.
        Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 1304-1306
        • McDonald T.R.
        Commentary. Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012; 24: 309
        • Nedelcu R.G.
        • Persson A.S.
        Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1461-1471
        • Patzelt S.B.
        • Bishti S.
        • Stampf S.
        • Att W.
        Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2014; 145: 1133-1140
        • Patzelt S.B.
        • Lamprinos C.
        • Stampf S.
        • Att W.
        The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2014; 145: 542-551
        • Kutkut A.
        • Abu-Hammad O.
        • Mitchell R.
        Esthetic considerations for reconstructing implant emergence profile using titanium and zirconia custom implant abutments: fifty case series report.
        J Oral Implantol. 31 Oct 2013; ([Epub ahead of print])