Statement of problem
The effect of toothbrushing on extrinsically stained pressable ceramic materials is unknown.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effects of toothbrushing on the shade and surface roughness of extrinsically stained, pressable ceramics.
Material and methods
Two materials, leucite-based (IPS Empress Esthetic [EE]; Ivoclar Vivadent AG) and lithium disilicate-based ceramic (IPS e.max Press [EP]; Ivoclar Vivadent AG), were studied. For each material, 24 disk-shaped specimens, 10 mm (diameter)×3 mm (height) were fabricated. Three different methods (n=8) of applying extrinsic stains were performed on each material: glazed only (G, control group); stained then glazed (SG); and stained and glazed together (T). The specimens were brushed with a multistation brushing machine under a load of 1.96 N at a rate of 90 strokes per minute with a soft and straight toothbrush (Oral-B #35) and a 1:1 toothpaste and distilled water slurry. Shade and roughness were measured at baseline and at 72, 144, 216, and 288 hours, which is equivalent to 3, 6, 9, and 12 years of simulated toothbrushing for 2 minutes twice a day. A repeated measures ANOVA with staining technique as a fixed factor was used to evaluate shade and roughness (α=.05).
For EE groups, no significant change was found after 12 years of simulated toothbrushing regarding shade and surface roughness, irrespective of staining techniques (P>.05). However, EP groups demonstrated a significant shade change and an increase in surface roughness after 12 years of simulated toothbrushing. Shade change was found to depend on the method of applying stain. For the EP-SG technique, a significant shade change was observed only at the 9- to 12-year interval (P=.047). However, the EP-T technique demonstrated a significant difference in shade between baseline and 3 years (P=.005) and in the 6- to 9-year interval (P=.005). Surface roughness was only significantly affected at baseline and 3 years for the EP-T group (P=.005).
For the shade and surface roughness of the EE groups, no statistically significant difference was found after 12 years of toothbrushing, irrespective of the staining technique. The shade and surface roughness of the EP groups were significantly statistically affected by toothbrushing time; only shade changes were found to depend on technique.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch.J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97: 200-208
- Performance assessment of Vita Easy Shade spectrophotometer on colour measurement of aesthetic dental materials.Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2011; 19: 168-174
- Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices.J Prosthodont. 2007; 16: 93-100
- Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue.Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17: 1407-1413
- The microscopic appearance and effect of toothbrushing on extrinsically stained metal-ceramic restorations.J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 571: 47-52
- Spectrophotometric study of the relationship between body porcelain color and applied metallic oxide pigments.J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 790-796
- Toothbrush abrasion of color-corrective porcelain stains applied to porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations.J Prosthet Dent. 1980; 44: 161-163
- Effect of toothbrushing on the material loss, roughness, and color of intrinsically and extrinsically stained porcelain used in metal-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15: 483-487
- A comparison of plaque removal by different toothbrushes and toothbrushing methods.Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1977; 24: 177-188
- Effect of brushing force and time on plaque removal using a powered toothbrush.J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30: 409-413
- Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force.J Clin Periodontol. 1998; 25: 413-416
- Abrasive properties of commonly used dentifrices.Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1979; 26: 225-242
- The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites.J Dent. 2010; 38: e123-e128
- Brushing-induced surface roughness of nickel-, palladium-, and gold-based dental casting alloys.J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99: 455-460
- The effect of multiple firings on the marginal integrity of pressable ceramic single crowns.J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107: 17-23
- Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review.J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98: 389-404
- Brushing force of manual and sonic toothbrushes affects dental hard tissue abrasion.Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17: 815-822
- Effect of toothbrushing on the toxicity of casting alloys.J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87: 94-98
- Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99: 361-368
- Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture.Dent Mater. 1999; 15: 79-86
- Comparison of surface roughness measurements by stylus profiler, AFM and non-contact optical profiler.Wear. 1995; 190: 76-88
- Effects of temperature on color stability of porcelain stains.J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 65: 507-512
- Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth.J Dent Res. 2002; 81: 578-582
- Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry.J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 819-822
- The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations.Br Dent J. 2004; 196: 42-45
- Toothbrush age and wear as it relates to plaque control.J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13: 52-56
Published online: November 14, 2015
Supported by an American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics Stanley D. Tylman Research Grant and the Marquette University School of Dentistry Student Research Fund.
© 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.