Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Accuracy of torque-limiting devices: A comparative evaluation

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      To prevent the loosening of implant screws, clinicians should be aware of the output torque values needed to achieve the desired preload. Accurate torque-control devices are crucial in this regard; however, little information is currently available comparing the accuracy of mechanical with that of electronic torque-control devices.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this in vitro study was to identify and compare the accuracy of different types of torque-control devices.

      Material and methods

      Devices from 5 different dental implant manufacturers were evaluated, including 2 spring-type (Straumann, Implance) mechanical devices (MTLD), 2 friction-type (Biohorizons, Dyna) MTLDs, and 1 (Megagen) electronic torque-control device (ETLD). For each manufacturer, 5 devices were tested 5 times with a digital torque tester, and the average for each device was calculated and recorded. The percentage of absolute deviations from the target torque values (PERDEV) were calculated and compared by using 1-way ANOVA. A 1-sample t test was used to evaluate the ability of each device to achieve its target torque value within a 95% confidence interval for the true population mean of measured values (α=.05 for all statistical analyses).

      Results

      One-way ANOVAs revealed statistically significant differences among torque-control devices (P<.001). ETLD showed higher PERDEVs (28.33 ±9.53) than MTLDs (P<.05), whereas PERDEVS of friction-type (7.56 ±3.64) and spring-type (10.85 ±4.11) MTLDs did not differ significantly. In addition, devices produced by Megagen had a significantly higher (P<.05) PERDEV (28.33 ±9.53) other devices, whereas no differences were found in devices manufactured by Biohorizons (7.31 ±5.34), Dyna (7.82 ±1.08), Implance (8.43 ±4.77), and Straumann (13.26 ±0.79). However, 1-sample t tests showed none of the torque-control devices evaluated in this study were capable of achieving their target torque values (P<.05).

      Conclusions

      Within the limitations of this in vitro study, MTLDs were shown to be significantly more accurate than ETLDs. However, none of the torque-control devices evaluated were able to meet their target torque values successfully.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wennstrom J.L.
        • Ekestubbe A.
        • Grondahl K.
        • Karlsson S.
        • Lindhe J.
        Implant-supported single-tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective study.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 567-574
        • Goodacre C.J.
        • Kan J.Y.
        • Rungcharassaeng K.
        Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 537-552
        • Pjetursson B.E.
        • Thoma D.
        • Jung R.
        • Zwahlen M.
        • Zembic A.
        A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 22-38
        • Pjetursson B.E.
        • Asgeirsson A.G.
        • Zwahlen M.
        • Sailer I.
        Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 308-324
        • Tan B.F.
        • Tan K.B.
        • Nicholls J.I.
        Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 648-658
        • Gumus H.O.
        • Zortuk M.
        • Albayrak H.
        • Dincel M.
        • Kocaagaoglu H.H.
        • Kilinc H.I.
        Effect of fluid contamination on reverse torque values in bone-level implants.
        Implant Dent. 2014; 23: 582-587
        • Binon P.
        • Sutter F.
        • Beaty K.
        • Brunski J.
        • Gulbransen H.
        • Weiner R.
        The role of screws in implant systems.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9: 48-63
        • Jorneus L.
        • Jemt T.
        • Carlsson L.
        Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7: 353-359
        • al-Turki L.E.
        • Chai J.
        • Lautenschlager E.P.
        • Hutten M.C.
        Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15: 38-42
        • McGlumphy E.A.
        • Mendel D.A.
        • Holloway J.A.
        Implant screw mechanics.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1998; 42: 71-89
        • Jemt T.
        • Laney W.R.
        • Harris D.
        • Henry P.J.
        • Krogh Jr., P.H.
        • Polizzi G.
        • et al.
        Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991; 6: 29-36
        • Spazzin A.O.
        • Henrique G.E.
        • Nobilo M.A.
        • Consani R.L.
        • Correr-Sobrinho L.
        • Mesquita M.F.
        Effect of retorque on loosening torque of prosthetic screws under two levels of fit of implant-supported dentures.
        Braz Dent J. 2010; 21: 12-17
        • Nigro F.
        • Sendyk C.L.
        • Francischone Jr., C.E.
        • Francischone C.E.
        Removal torque of zirconia abutment screws under dry and wet conditions.
        Braz Dent J. 2010; 21: 225-228
        • Byrne D.
        • Jacobs S.
        • O'Connell B.
        • Houston F.
        • Claffey N.
        Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
        J Prosthodont. 2006; 15: 164-171
        • Broggini N.
        • McManus L.M.
        • Hermann J.S.
        • Medina R.
        • Schenk R.K.
        • Buser D.
        • et al.
        Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface.
        J Dent Res. 2006; 85: 473-478
        • Tzenakis G.K.
        • Nagy W.W.
        • Fournelle R.A.
        • Dhuru V.B.
        The effect of repeated torque and salivary contamination on the preload of slotted gold implant prosthetic screws.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88: 183-191
        • Haack J.E.
        • Sakaguchi R.L.
        • Sun T.
        • Coffey J.P.
        Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10: 529-536
        • Burguete R.L.
        • Johns R.B.
        • King T.
        • Patterson E.A.
        Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 592-599
        • Cibirka R.M.
        • Nelson S.K.
        • Lang B.R.
        • Rueggeberg F.A.
        Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85: 268-275
        • Guda T.
        • Ross T.A.
        • Lang L.A.
        • Millwater H.R.
        Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100: 183-193
        • Siamos G.
        • Winkler S.
        • Boberick K.G.
        Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses.
        J Oral Implantol. 2002; 28: 67-73
        • Goheen K.L.
        • Vermilyea S.G.
        • Vossoughi J.
        • Agar J.R.
        Torque generated by handheld screwdrivers and mechanical torquing devices for osseointegrated implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9: 149-155
        • Vallee M.C.
        • Conrad H.J.
        • Basu S.
        • Seong W.J.
        Accuracy of friction-style and spring-style mechanical torque limiting devices for dental implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100: 86-92
        • Britton-Vidal E.
        • Baker P.
        • Mettenburg D.
        • Pannu D.S.
        • Looney S.W.
        • Londono J.
        • et al.
        Accuracy and precision of as-received implant torque wrenches.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 811-816
        • Standlee J.P.
        • Caputo A.A.
        Accuracy of an electric torque-limiting device for implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 278-281
        • Yilmaz B.
        • L'Homme-Langlois E.
        • Beck F.M.
        • McGlumphy E.
        Effect of long-term steam autoclaving on changes in torque delivery of spring- and friction-type torque wrenches.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 115: 718-721
        • Standlee J.P.
        • Caputo A.A.
        • Chwu M.Y.
        • Sun T.T.
        Accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting devices for implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 220-224
        • Cehreli M.C.
        • Akca K.
        • Tonuk E.
        Accuracy of a manual torque application device for morse-taper implants: a technical note.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 743-748
        • L'Homme-Langlois E.
        • Yilmaz B.
        • Chien H.H.
        • McGlumphy E.
        Accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting devices for dental implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 524-528
        • Steinebrunner L.
        • Harder S.
        • Wolfart S.
        • Freitag-Wolf S.
        • Kern M.
        The precision of mechanical torque wrenches used for implants in dental offices.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28: 527-530
        • Yilmaz B.
        • L'Homme-Langlois E.
        • Beck F.M.
        • McGlumphy E.
        Accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting devices for dental implants after clinical service.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 378-382
        • Mitrani R.
        • Nicholls J.I.
        • Phillips K.M.
        • Ma T.
        Accuracy of electronic implant torque controllers following time in clinical service.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 394-399
        • Kim D.-G.
        • Cho L.-R.
        • Park C.-J.
        Comparison of the torque stability of implant torque controllers.
        J Korean Dent Sci. 2009; 2: 19-27
        • Santos Jr., G.C.
        • Passos S.P.
        • Coelho Santos M.J.
        Accuracy of mechanical torque devices for implants used in Brazilian dental offices.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2011; 24: 38-39
        • Dellinges M.
        • Curtis D.
        Effects of infection control procedures on the accuracy of a new mechanical torque wrench system for implant restorations.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75: 93-98
        • Kılınç H.I.
        • Albayrak H.
        • Tursun F.
        • Gumus H.O.
        Accuracy of different types of wrenches fabricated by different implant manufacturers.
        Clin Dent Res. 2015; 39: 95-100
        • Chaar M.S.
        • Att W.
        • Strub J.R.
        Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38: 697-711
        • Esposito M.
        • Grusovin M.G.
        • Pellegrino G.
        • Soardi E.
        • Felice P.
        Safety and effectiveness of maxillary early loaded titanium implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface (Xpeed): 1-year results from a pilot multicenter randomised controlled trial.
        Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012; 5: 241-249