Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Effect of silane contamination on dentin bond strength

Published:September 28, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.021

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      Intraoral repair of porcelain or other silica-based ceramics typically requires the use of silane in the repair protocol. Some porcelain intraoral repairs also involve bonding to exposed or involved tooth tissues including dentin. A study is needed to evaluate whether the cross-contamination of dentin with silane affects bond strength to this tissue.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of silane cross-contamination on dentin bond strength.

      Material and methods

      Flat surfaces of human dentin specimens were created, followed by wet polishing with 320-grit silicon carbide paper. The dentin specimens were divided into 4 groups: group SE (All-Bond Universal Adhesive used in self-etching mode); group SiSE (silane applied to dentin followed by All-Bond Universal Adhesive used in self-etching mode); group ER (All-Bond Universal Adhesive used in total-etch (etch-and-rinse) mode); and group ERSi (Etch and rinse and silane applied to dentin followed by All-Bond Universal Adhesive). The dentin specimens were treated with a universal adhesive (All-Bond Universal) and bonded with a composite resin, using an Ultradent jig mold. Shear bond strength (n=10) was measured after 24 hours of water storage at 37°C. After the shear bond strength test, the dentin sides of fractured specimens in each group were examined with a stereomicroscope at ×15 magnification to determine failure modes. Data were statistically analyzed by 2-way and a 1-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey honest significant difference test (α=.05). Scanning electron microscopy examination was used to evaluate the dentin surface morphology before and after bonding.

      Results

      The shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin was not affected adversely when the dentin was contaminated with silane prior to using All-Bond Universal in the self-etch or total- etch (phosphoric acid) mode. SE, 30.3 ±3.8 MPa; SiSE, 32.9 ±3.9 MPa; ER, 34.9 ±3.1 MPa; ERSi: 35.2 ±4.9 MPa (P>.05)

      Conclusions

      Under the conditions of this study, cross-contamination of dentin with silane before the use of All-Bond Universal in the self-etch or total-etch with phosphoric acid mode did not adversely affect composite resin bond strength to dentin.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Edelhoff D.
        • Sorensen J.A.
        Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87: 503-509
        • Alex G.
        Preparing porcelain surfaces for optimal bonding.
        Compendium. 2008; 29: 2-14
        • Kupiec K.A.
        • Wuertz K.M.
        • Barkmeier W.W.
        • Wilwerding T.M.
        Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite to porcelain repair.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76: 119-124
        • Hayakawa T.
        • Horie K.
        • Aida M.
        • Kanaya H.
        • Kobayashi T.
        • Murata Y.
        The influence of surface conditions and silane agents on the bond of resin to dental porcelain.
        Dent Mater. 1992; 8: 238-240
        • Kimmich M.
        • Stappert C.F.J.
        Intraoral treatment of veneering porcelain chipping of fixed dental restorations: a review and clinical application.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2013; 144: 31-44
        • Blatz M.B.
        • Sadan A.
        • Kern M.
        Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 268-274
        • Chen L.
        • Suh B.I.
        Bonding or resin materials to all-ceramics: a review.
        Curr Res Dent. 2012; 3: 7-17
        • Chen L.
        • Suh B.I.
        • Brown D.
        • Chen X.
        Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths.
        Am J Dent. 2012; 25: 103-108
        • Magne P.
        • Paranhos M.P.
        • Burnett L.H.
        New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements.
        Dent Mater. 2010; 26: 345-352
        • Piascik J.R.
        • Swift E.J.
        • Braswell K.
        • Stoner B.R.
        Surface fluorination of zirconia: adhesive bond strength comparison to commercial primers.
        Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 604-608
        • Chen L.
        • Suh B.I.
        • Kim J.
        • Tay F.R.
        Evaluation of silica-coating techniques for zirconia bonding.
        Am J Dent. 2011; 24: 79-84
        • Kern M.
        • Barloi A.
        • Yang B.
        Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding.
        J Dent Res. 2009; 88: 817-822
        • Akgungor G.
        • Sen D.
        • Aydin M.
        Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99: 388-399
        • Lung C.Y.K.
        • Matinlinna J.P.
        Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview.
        Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 467-477
        • Filho A.M.
        • Vieira L.C.
        • Araújo E.
        • Monteiro Júnior S.
        Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength.
        J Prosthodont. 2004; 13: 28-35
        • Shahverdi S.
        • Canay Ş.
        • Şahin E.
        • Bilge A.
        Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain.
        J Oral Rehabil. 1998; 25: 699-705
        • Saracoglu A.
        • Ozcan M.
        • Kumbuloglu O.
        • Turkun M.
        Adhesion of resin composite to hydrofluoric acid-exposed enamel and dentin in repair protocols.
        Oper Dent. 2011; 36: 545-553
        • Staxrud F.
        • Dahl J.E.
        Silanising agents promote resin-composite repair.
        Int Dent J. 2015; 65: 311-315
        • Mustafa A.A.
        • Matinlinna J.P.
        • Saidin S.
        • Kadir M.R.
        The influence of experimental silane primers on dentin bond strength and morphology: a laboratory and finite element analysis study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1498-1506
        • Wagner A.
        • Wendler M.
        • Petschelt A.
        • Belli R.
        • Lohbauer U.
        Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes.
        J Dent. 2014; 42: 800-807
        • Alex G.
        Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015; 36: 15-26
        • Van Meerbeek B.
        • Yoshihara K.
        • Yoshida Y.
        • Mine A.
        • De Munck J.
        • Van Landuyt K.L.
        State of the art of self-etch adhesives.
        Dent Mater. 2011; 27: 17-28
        • Yoshihara K.
        • Yoshida Y.
        • Nagaoka N.
        • Hayakawa S.
        • Okihara T.
        • De Munck J.
        • et al.
        Adhesive interfacial interaction affected by different carbon-chain monomers.
        Dent Mater. 2013; 29: 888-897