Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Tips from Our Readers| Volume 118, ISSUE 5, P686-688, November 2017

Download started.

Ok

Do not let the Spanish “s” misguide you

      Abstract

      The orthographic representation of the “s” in the Spanish language may have three phonetic variations and be associated with other phonological phenomena that add to its unpredictability when used to evaluate the closest speaking space. These are of clinical interest since each of these variations may represent a more or less pronounced difference from what is observed in the English language and patient population. The present article explains the previously mentioned variations and reviews the suggested Spanish terms for evaluation of the closest speaking space.
      In prosthodontics, phonetics assumes a role of major importance in assessing and establishing a functionally acceptable incisal edge position, maxillomandibular relationship, and occlusal vertical dimension.
      • Silverman M.M.
      Accurate measurement of vertical dimension by phonetics and the speaking centric space.
      • Pound E.
      Let /S/ be your guide.
      The /s/ sound, such as in the English word “sun,” was first described by Silverman in 1951
      • Silverman M.M.
      Accurate measurement of vertical dimension by phonetics and the speaking centric space.
      as being of great value for the assessment of what was later described as the closest speaking space (CSS). This sound is produced when the mandible assumes its most forward, most closed position during conversational speech and, according to Pound,
      • Pound E.
      Let /S/ be your guide.
      consists of a subtle whistle created when air is forced through a 1- to 1.5-mm space between the incisal edges of the mandibular central incisors and the coronal surfaces of the maxillary central incisors. However, most recent articles have found the CSS to be closer to 2 or 2.5 mm in both English and non-English speaking populations.
      The glossary of prosthodontic terms. Ninth edition.
      • Burnett C.A.
      • Clifford T.J.
      Closest speaking space during the production of sibilant sounds and its value in establishing the vertical dimension of occlusion.
      • De Souza R.F.
      • Compagnoni M.A.
      • Leles C.R.
      • Sadalla K.B.F.
      Association between the speaking space of /s/ sound and incisal overlaps in dentate and edentate subjects.
      The CSS is therefore a useful method of determining the occlusal vertical dimension
      • Burnett C.A.
      • Clifford T.J.
      Closest speaking space during the production of sibilant sounds and its value in establishing the vertical dimension of occlusion.
      and may be achieved not only through the pronunciation of the /s/ sound but also through other “surd” and “sonant” sibilants such as /sh/, /ch/, /z/, /zh/, and /j/ sounds. These sounds present with similar labial and incisal patterns,
      • Burnett C.A.
      • Clifford T.J.
      Closest speaking space during the production of sibilant sounds and its value in establishing the vertical dimension of occlusion.
      although not all are represented in Spanish.
      • Robinson F.G.
      • Sullivan J.A.
      Evaluating the closest speaking space with Spanish terms.
      Despite its great value in the rehabilitation of the native English speaking population, other populations may present considerable variations between the /s/ and its correspondent sounds. The presence of variations was acknowledged by Silverman,
      • Silverman M.M.
      Accurate measurement of vertical dimension by phonetics and the speaking centric space.
      who recommended the study and analysis of variations in phonetic sounds for languages other than English in order to determine which would cause the mandible to assume its closest level in relation to the maxilla.
      The goal of the present article was to highlight the phonetic variations that the /s/ may assume in Spanish speaking populations and suggest new targets for the determination of CSS in these populations. The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) is used throughout the present article to provide consistency when referring to phonetic transcription.

      International Phonetic Association. The international phonetic alphabet and the IPA chart. 2016. Available at: https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/ipa-chart.

      Phonetic Variations of the Spanish /S/

      The /s/ has been described to be “the most unpredictable, elusive, shifting, erratic, and troublesome sound in the Spanish language.”
      The glossary of prosthodontic terms. Ninth edition.
      Special attention should therefore be given to the Spanish speaking population.
      • Obaid A.H.
      The vagaries of the Spanish “S”.
      • Mack S.
      A sociophonetic analysis of /s/ variation in Puerto Rican Spanish.
      • Schmidt L.
      Regional variation in the perception of sociophonetic variants of Spanish /s/.
      • Garcia A.
      Allophonic variation in the Spanish sibilant fricative [dissertation].
      Spanish is the second most spoken language in the world, with approximately 427 million native speakers.

      Ethnologue. Summary by language size. 2016. Available at: http://www.ethnologue.com/statistics/size.

      Simultaneously, the Hispanic population has been reported to be the fastest-growing minority group in the United States, with 56.6 million people representing 17.6% of the US population in 2015.

      Bureau U. FFF: Hispanic heritage month 2016. Available at: http://www.census.gov/newsroom/facts-for-features/2016/cb16-ff16.html.

      In the Spanish language, the orthographic representation of the letter “s” [/s/] has been described as presenting 3 main phonetic variations:
      Other phonological phenomena adding to the complexity of the /s/ in the Spanish language include its weakening in intervocalic positions and replacement by /h/, as described in Latin American Spanish, with the exception of Argentina, Bolivia, and Uruguay,
      • Obaid A.H.
      The vagaries of the Spanish “S”.
      and a “strong tendency” for it to disappear:
      • At the end of words
      • At the end of a syllable
      • In absolute final position
      • At the end of a word in a phrase where the next word begins with a vowel
      • In some absolute initial positions
      • In 2 successive syllables
      • At the beginning of a breath group
      • At the beginning of a syllable in the middle of a word shielded by a preceding consonant.
        • Obaid A.H.
        The vagaries of the Spanish “S”.
      In addition, the clinician should also be aware that the Spanish language also presents distinct pronunciations ranging from a “literary/cultivated” Spanish to a “rustic/popular” Spanish, also capable of affecting the pronunciation of /s/.
      • Obaid A.H.
      The vagaries of the Spanish “S”.

      Suggested Spanish Terms for Evaluation of CSS

      With the previous considerations in mind, the suggested Spanish terms used to aid in the evaluation of the CSS should be reviewed.
      • Robinson F.G.
      • Sullivan J.A.
      Evaluating the closest speaking space with Spanish terms.
      Robinson and Sullivan
      • Robinson F.G.
      • Sullivan J.A.
      Evaluating the closest speaking space with Spanish terms.
      suggested the following Spanish terms when evaluating the CSS:
      • /s/ - Ciento seis (One hundred six);
      • /ch/ - Chica (Girl);
      • /z/ - Asma (Asthma);
      • /j/ - Inyeccion (Injection);
      • /ch/, /s/ - Muchas gracias (Thank you very much);
      • /ch/, /s/ - Mucho gusto (Pleased to meet you).
      However, in order to avoid the variations that the /s/ may present phonetically in the Spanish language, some alterations are presented in the terms recommended by Robinson and Sullivan
      • Robinson F.G.
      • Sullivan J.A.
      Evaluating the closest speaking space with Spanish terms.
      to more consistently achieve the sibilant sounds associated with the CSS in Spanish speaking populations:
      • /s/ Distincion (Distinction);
      • /ch/ Chica (Girl);
      • /z/ Juzgar (To judge);
      • /j/ Inyeccion (Injection);
      • /ch/, /s/ Mucho sol (A lot of sunlight).

      Summary

      The orthographic representation of the “s” in the Spanish language may have 3 phonetic variations: [s], [], and [θ] and be associated with other phonological phenomena that add to its unpredictability when used to evaluate the CSS. These are of clinical interest since each of these variations may represent a more or less pronounced difference from what is observed in the English language and patient population. It is recommended therefore that clinicians take care when evaluating the CSS in the Spanish speaking patient population; the inclusion of other sibilant sounds such as the ones proposed in this article should be considered.

      References

        • Silverman M.M.
        Accurate measurement of vertical dimension by phonetics and the speaking centric space.
        Part I. Dent Dig. 1951; 57: 261-265
        • Pound E.
        Let /S/ be your guide.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1977; 38: 482-489
      1. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. Ninth edition.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: e1-e105
        • Burnett C.A.
        • Clifford T.J.
        Closest speaking space during the production of sibilant sounds and its value in establishing the vertical dimension of occlusion.
        J Dent Res. 1993; 72: 964-967
        • De Souza R.F.
        • Compagnoni M.A.
        • Leles C.R.
        • Sadalla K.B.F.
        Association between the speaking space of /s/ sound and incisal overlaps in dentate and edentate subjects.
        J Appl Oral Sci. 2005; 13: 413-417
        • Robinson F.G.
        • Sullivan J.A.
        Evaluating the closest speaking space with Spanish terms.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 333
      2. International Phonetic Association. The international phonetic alphabet and the IPA chart. 2016. Available at: https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/ipa-chart.

        • Obaid A.H.
        The vagaries of the Spanish “S”.
        Hispania. 1973; 56: 60-67
        • Mack S.
        A sociophonetic analysis of /s/ variation in Puerto Rican Spanish.
        in: Luis A.L. Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. 1st ed. Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Somerville2011: 81-93
        • Schmidt L.
        Regional variation in the perception of sociophonetic variants of Spanish /s/.
        in: Carvalho A. Beaudrie S. Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. 1st ed. Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Somerville, MA2013: 189-202
        • Garcia A.
        Allophonic variation in the Spanish sibilant fricative [dissertation].
        University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee2013
      3. Ethnologue. Summary by language size. 2016. Available at: http://www.ethnologue.com/statistics/size.

      4. Bureau U. FFF: Hispanic heritage month 2016. Available at: http://www.census.gov/newsroom/facts-for-features/2016/cb16-ff16.html.