Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Effect of tooth substrate and porcelain thickness on porcelain veneer failure loads in vitro

Published:December 19, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.018

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      Bonded porcelain veneers are widely used esthetic restorations. High success and survival rates have been reported, but failures do occur. Fractures are the commonest failure mode. Minimally invasive or thin veneers have gained popularity. Increased enamel and porcelain thickness improve the strength of veneers bonded to enamel, but less is known about dentin or mixed substrates.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the influences of tooth substrate type (all-enamel, all-dentin, or half-dentin-half-enamel) and veneer thickness on the loads needed to cause initial and catastrophic porcelain veneer failure.

      Material and methods

      Model discoid porcelain veneer specimens of varying thicknesses were bonded to the flattened facial surfaces of incisors with different enamel and dentin tooth substrates, artificially aged, and loaded to failure with a small sphere. Initial and catastrophic fracture events were identified and analyzed statistically and fractographically.

      Results

      Fracture events included initial Hertzian cracks, intermediate radial cracks, and catastrophic gross failure. All specimens retained some porcelain after catastrophic failure. Cement failure occurred at the cement–porcelain interface not at the cement–tooth interface. Porcelain veneers bonded to enamel were substantially stronger and more damage-tolerant than those bonded to dentin or mixed substrates. Increased porcelain thickness substantially raised the loads to catastrophic failure on enamel substrates but only moderately raised the loads to catastrophic failure on dentin or mixed substrates. The veneers bonded to half-dentin-half-enamel behaved remarkably like those bonded wholly to dentin.

      Conclusions

      Porcelain veneers bonded to enamel were substantially stronger and more damage-tolerant than those bonded to dentin or half-enamel-half dentin.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Calamia J.R.
        Etched porcelain facial veneers: a new treatment modality based on scientific and clinical evidence.
        N Y J Dent. 1983; 53: 255-259
        • Horn H.R.
        Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel.
        Dent Clin North Am. 1983; 27: 671-684
        • Ibsen R.L.
        Cerinate porcelain laminate keeps the dentist, dental laboratory, and the patient smiling.
        Trends Tech Dental Lab. 1985; 2: 46-47
        • Peumans M.
        • Van Meerbeek B.
        • Lambrechts P.
        • Vanherle G.
        Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature.
        J Dent. 2000; 28: 163-177
        • White S.N.
        • Paine M.L.
        • Luo W.
        • Sarikaya M.
        • Fong H.
        • Yu Z.
        • et al.
        The dentino-enamel junction is a broad transitional zone uniting dissimilar bioceramic composites.
        J Am Ceram Soc. 2000; 83: 238-240
        • White S.N.
        • Miklus V.G.
        • Chang P.P.
        • Caputo A.A.
        • Fong H.
        • Sarikaya M.
        • et al.
        Controlled failure mechanisms toughen the dentino-enamel junction zone.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94: 330-335
        • Imbeni V.
        • Kruzic J.J.
        • Marshall G.W.
        • Marshall S.J.
        • Ritchie R.O.
        The dentin-enamel junction and the fracture of human teeth.
        Nat Mater. 2005; 4: 229-232
        • Calamia J.R.
        Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art.
        Quintessence Int. 1985; 16: 5-12
        • Shaini F.J.
        • Shortall A.C.
        • Marquis P.M.
        Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years.
        J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24: 553-559
        • Calamia J.R.
        • Calamia C.S.
        Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success.
        Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51: 399-417
        • Matson M.R.
        • Lewgoy H.R.
        • Barros Filho D.A.
        • Amore R.
        • Anido-Anido A.
        • Alonso R.C.
        • et al.
        Finite element analysis of stress distribution in intact and porcelain veneer restored teeth.
        Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2011; 1: 1-6
        • Ge C.
        • Green C.
        • Sederstrom D.
        • McLaren E.A.
        • White S.N.
        Effect of porcelain and enamel thickness on porcelain veneer failure loads in vitro.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111: 380-387
        • Quinn F.
        • McConnell R.J.
        • Byrne D.
        Porcelain laminates: a review.
        Br Dent J. 1986; 161: 61-65
        • McLean J.W.
        Ceramics in clinical dentistry.
        Br Dent J. 1988; 164: 187-194
        • Clyde J.S.
        • Gilmour A.
        Porcelain veneers: a preliminary review.
        Br Dent J. 1988; 164: 9-14
        • Calamia J.R.
        Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain veneers.
        Am J Dent. 1989; 2: 9-15
        • Strassler H.E.
        • Nathanson D.
        Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain veneers over a period of 18 to 42 months.
        J Esthet Dent. 1989; 1: 21-28
        • Jordan R.E.
        • Suzuki M.
        • Senda A.
        Clinical evaluation of porcelain laminate veneers: a four-year recall report.
        J Esthet Dent. 1989; 1: 126-137
        • Garber D.A.
        Porcelain laminate veneers—to prepare or not to prepare?.
        Compendium. 1991; 12 (178-2)
        • Crispin B.J.
        Expanding the application of facial ceramic veneers.
        J Cal Dent Assoc. 1993; 21 (48): 43-46
        • Nordbø H.
        • Rygh Thoresen N.
        • Henaug T.
        Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers without incisal overlapping: 3-year results.
        J Dent. 1994; 22: 342-345
        • Brunton P.A.
        • Wilson N.H.
        Preparations for porcelain laminate veneers in general dental practice.
        Br Dent J. 1998; 184: 553-556
        • Peumans M.
        • Van Meerbeek B.
        • Lambrechts P.
        • Vuylsteke-Wauters M.
        • Vanherle G.
        Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers.
        Quintessence Int. 1998; 29: 211-221
        • Rouse J.
        • McGowan S.
        Restoration of the anterior maxilla with ultraconservative veneers: clinical and laboratory considerations.
        Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999; 11: 333-339
        • Peumans M.
        • De Munck J.
        • Fieuws S.
        • Lambrechts P.
        • Vanherle G.
        • Van Meerbeek B.
        A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers.
        J Adhes Dent. 2004; 6: 65-76
        • Gresnigt M.
        • Özcan M.
        Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth with porcelain laminates and sectional veneers.
        J Can Dent Assoc. 2011; 77: b143
        • McLaren E.A.
        • LeSage B.
        Feldspathic veneers: what are their indications?.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011; 32: 44-49
        • Radz G.M.
        Minimum thickness anterior porcelain restorations.
        Dent Clin North Am. 2011; 55: 353-370
        • Horvath S.
        • Schulz C.P.
        Minimally invasive restoration of a maxillary central incisor with a partial veneer.
        Eur J Esthet Dent. 2012; 7: 6-16
        • Gurel G.
        • Sesma N.
        • Calamita M.A.
        • Coachman C.
        • Morimoto S.
        Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 31-39
        • Ferrari M.
        • Patroni S.
        • Balleri P.
        Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers.
        Int J Periodontics Rest Dent. 1992; 12: 407-413
        • Christensen G.J.
        • Christensen R.P.
        Clinical observations of porcelain veneers: a three-year report.
        J Esthetic Dent. 1991; 3: 174-179
        • Christensen G.J.
        Veneer mania.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137: 1161-1163
        • Nattress B.R.
        • Youngson C.C.
        • Patterson C.J.
        • Martin D.M.
        • Ralph J.P.
        An in vitro assessment of tooth preparation for porcelain veneer restorations.
        J Dent. 1995; 23: 165-170
        • Brunton P.A.
        • Richmond S.
        • Wilson N.H.
        Variations in the depth of preparations for porcelain laminate veneers.
        Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1997; 5: 89-92
        • Friedman M.J.
        A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure-a clinician’s observations.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998; 19: 625-636
        • Walls A.W.
        The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during the management of fractured and worn anterior teeth: Part 2 Clinical results after 5 years of follow-up.
        Br Dent J. 1995; 178: 337-340
        • Friedman M.J.
        Porcelain veneer restorations: a clinician's opinion about a disturbing trend.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001; 5: 318-327
        • Dumfahrt H.
        • Schäffer H.
        Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service. Part II. Clinical results.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13: 9-18
        • Guess P.C.
        • Stappert C.F.
        Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers.
        Dent Mater. 2008; 24: 804-813
        • Granell-Ruiz M.
        • Fons-Font A.
        • Labaig-Rueda C.
        • Martínez-González A.
        • Román-Rodríguez J.L.
        • Solá-Ruiz M.F.
        A clinical longitudinal study 323 porcelain laminate veneers. Period of study from 3 to 11 years.
        Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15: e531-e537
        • Öztürk E.
        • Bolay Ş.R.
        • Hickel R.N.
        • Ilie N.
        Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers to enamel, dentine and enamel-dentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems.
        J Dent. 2013; 41: 97-105
        • Piemjai M.
        • Arksornnukit M.
        Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems.
        J Prosthodont. 2007; 16: 457-464
        • Dunne S.M.
        • Millar B.J.
        A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers.
        Br Dent J. 1993; 175: 317-321
        • Beier U.S.
        • Kapferer I.
        • Burtscher D.
        • Dumfahrt H.
        Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2012; 25: 79-85
        • Cherukara G.P.
        • Davis G.R.
        • Seymour K.G.
        • Zou L.
        • Samarawickrama D.Y.
        Dentin exposure in tooth preparations for porcelain veneers: a pilot study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94: 414-420
        • Hajtó J.
        • Marinescu C.
        An esthetic challenge: isolated areas of high translucency in laminate veneers.
        Eur J Esthet Dent. 2012; 7: 282-294
        • Burke F.J.T.
        Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012; 24: 257-265
        • Fradeani M.
        • Redemagni M.
        • Corrado M.
        Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation—a retrospective study.
        Int J Periodontics Res Dent. 2005; 25: 9-17
        • Barghi N.
        • Berry T.G.
        Post-bonding crack formation in porcelain veneers.
        J Esthet Dent. 1997; 9: 51-54
        • Prakki A.
        • Cilli R.
        • Da Costa A.U.
        • Gonçalves S.E.
        • Mondelli R.F.
        • Pereira J.C.
        Effect of resin luting film thickness on fracture resistance of a ceramic cemented to dentin.
        J Prosthodont. 2007; 16: 172-178
        • Magne P.
        • Versluis A.
        • Douglas W.H.
        Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on the stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 335-344
        • White S.N.
        • Zhao X.Y.
        • Yu Z.
        • Li Z.C.
        Cyclic mechanical fatigue of a feldspathic dental porcelain.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8: 413-420
        • Lawn B.R.
        • Deng Y.
        • Lloyd I.K.
        • Janal M.N.
        • Rekow E.D.
        • Thompson V.P.
        Materials design of ceramic-based layer structures for crowns.
        J Dent Res. 2002; 81: 433-438