Abstract
This clinical report describes the prosthetic and surgical management of a patient
with a restricted oral orifice due to a perioral burn. Complete oral rehabilitation
was achieved with maxillary and mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses using
a combination of digital and conventional impressions, design, and processing techniques.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic DentistryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- A clinical study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the “all on four” immediate function protocol.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 428-434
- An alternative conversion technique for fabricating an interim fixed implant-supported complete arch prosthesis.J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 647-651
- Fabrication of a definitive obturator from a 3D cast with a chairside digital scanner for a patient with severe gag reflex: A clinical report.J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 735-738
- Fabrication of a complete, removable dental prosthesis from a digital intraoral impression for a patient with an excessively tight reconstructed lip after oral cancer treatment: A clinical report.J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 205-208
- Precision of dental implant digitization using intraoral scanners.Int J Prosthodont. 2016; 29: 277-283
- Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: Systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives.J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 361-366
- Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.J Orofac Orthop. 2017; 78: 211-220
- Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.J Dent. 2007; 35: 903-908
- Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations.J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 210-215
- Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-an in vitro study.Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16: 851-856
- Use of CAD-CAM technology for the fabrication of complete dentures: An alternative technique.J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 118: 140-143
- Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study.BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17: 92
- Digital process for an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report.J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 469-473
- Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: An in vitro study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 648-653
- Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral and extraoral scanners: An in vitro study using a new method of evaluation.Int J Comput Dent. 2017; 20: 151-164
- Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151: 1178-1187
- Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: A comparative study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 1360-1367
- A technique for fabricating a hinged mandibular complete dental prosthesis with swing lock for a patient with microstomia.J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110: 540-543
- Impression procedures and construction of a sectional denture for a patient with microstomia: A clinical report.J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96: 387-390
- The OSU frame: A novel approach to fabricating immediate load fixed-detachable prostheses.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62: 17-21
- Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: A critical review.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25: 506-515
- Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit.J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 7-13
- Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: Accuracy outcomes.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 465-472
- Impression procedure for patients with severely limited mouth opening.J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 241-244
Article info
Publication history
Published online: March 15, 2018
Identification
Copyright
© 2017 by the Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
