Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Simulation of tissue-prosthesis margin interface by using surface scanning and digital design for auricular prostheses

  • Lindsay McHutchion
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Ms Lindsay McHutchion, Institute for Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine, Misericordia Community Hospital, 1W-02 16940 87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T5R 4H5, CANADA
    Affiliations
    Anaplastologist, Institute for Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine, Edmonton, Canada

    Graduate student, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Daniel Aalto
    Affiliations
    Assistant Professor, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

    Research Scientist, Institute for Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine, Edmonton, Canada
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      One of the most challenging aspects of auricular prosthesis design and fabrication is ensuring that the prosthesis fits the patient through a range of head and facial movements. Techniques used in conventional prosthetic treatment pathways account for issues of prosthesis fit, but this challenge has not been fully addressed in emerging treatment pathways that use digital technology.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this clinical study was to develop and evaluate a digital workflow by using surface scan data and incorporating the simulation of tissue movement into the design of auricular prostheses that fit the participant through a range of facial movements. An iterative design process was used to develop a design workflow through a sequential case series of participants with auricular prostheses.

      Material and methods

      Scan data were acquired from a case series of 5 participants with existing implant-retained auricular prostheses. An iterative design process was used to digitally design auricular prostheses that fit the participants through a range of jaw and facial movements. The fit, shape, and retention of the digitally designed and conventionally made prostheses were assessed and compared. Design considerations were identified and documented through the iterative design process.

      Results

      A final design workflow was iteratively developed based on the 5 participants. The shapes of the digitally designed prostheses were well matched to nontreatment anatomy overall. Prosthesis fit was variable: Some digitally designed prostheses fit the participant intimately through a range of movements, and others experienced significant gaps between the margins and the tissues.

      Conclusions

      An iterative design process provided a method of working toward quality improvement. Although the final design workflow provides a generally successful method of manipulating scan data in the design of auricular prostheses, the prosthesis fit at the anterior margin during facial movements remains variable and requires further development to achieve a consistently acceptable solution.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Davis B.K.
        The role of technology in facial prosthetics.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 18: 332-340
        • Bibb R.
        • Eggbeer D.
        • Evans P.
        Rapid prototyping technologies in soft tissue facial prosthetics: current state of the art.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2010; 16: 130-137
        • McHutchion L.
        • Kincade C.
        • Wolfaardt J.
        Integration of digital technology in the workflow for an osseointegrated implant-retained nasal prosthesis: a clinical report.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 858-862
        • Watson J.
        • Hatamleh M.M.
        Complete integration of technology for improved reproduction of auricular prostheses.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111: 430-436
        • Farook T.H.
        • Jamayet N.B.
        • Abdullah J.Y.
        • Rajion Z.A.
        • Alam M.K.
        A systematic review of the computerized tools and digital techniques applied to fabricate nasal, auricular, orbital and ocular prostheses for facial defect rehabilitation.
        J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 121: 268-277
        • Unkovskiy A.
        • Roehler A.
        • Huettig F.
        • Geis-Gerstorfer J.
        • Brom J.
        • Keutel C.
        • et al.
        Simplifying the digital workflow of facial prostheses manufacturing using a three-dimensional (3D) database: setup, development, and aspects of virtual data validation for reproduction.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2019; : 1-9
        • Hatamleh M.M.
        • Watson J.
        Construction of an implant-retained auricular prosthesis with the aid of contemporary digital technologies: a clinical report.
        J Prosthodont. 2013; 22: 132-136
        • Ciocca L.
        • Scotti R.
        CAD-CAM generated ear cast by means of a laser scanner and rapid prototyping machine.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 591-595
        • Subburaj K.
        • Nair C.
        • Rajesh S.
        • Meshram S.M.
        • Ravi B.
        Rapid development of auricular prosthesis using CAD and rapid prototyping technologies.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36: 938-943
        • Burton H.E.
        • Peel S.
        • Eggbeer D.
        Reporting fidelity in the literature for computer aided design and additive manufacture of implants and guides.
        Addit Manuf. 2018; 23: 362-373
        • Wolfaardt J.F.
        • Coss P.
        An impression and cast construction technique for implant-retained auricular prostheses.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75: 45-49
        • Kubon T.M.
        Creating an adaptable anterior margin for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 233-240
        • Nuseir A.
        • Hatamleh M.M.
        • Alnazzawi A.
        • Al-Rabab’ah M.
        • Kamel B.
        • Jaradat E.
        Direct 3D printing of flexible nasal prosthesis: optimized digital workflow from scan to fit.
        J Prosthodont. 2019; 28: 10-14
        • Unkovskiy A.
        • Spintzyk S.
        • Brom J.
        • Huettig F.
        • Keutel C.
        Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: A preliminary experience in digital workflow.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120: 303-308
        • Unkovskiy A.
        • Brom J.
        • Huettig F.
        • Keutel C.
        Auricular prostheses produced by means of conventional and digital Workflows: a clinical report on esthetic outcomes.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2018; 31: 63-66
        • Cheah C.M.
        • Chua C.
        • Tan K.H.
        Integration of laser surface digitizing with CAD/CAM techniques for developing facial prostheses. Part 2: development of molding techniques for casting prosthetic parts.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16: 543-548
        • De Crescenzio F.
        • Fantini M.
        • Ciocca L.
        • Persiani F.
        • Scotti R.
        Design and manufacturing of ear prosthesis by means of rapid prototyping technology.
        Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2011; 225: 296-302
        • Yadav S.
        • Narayan A.I.
        • Choudhry A.
        • Balakrishnan D.
        CAD/CAM-assisted auricular prosthesis fabrication for a quick, precise, and more retentive outcome: a clinical report.
        J Prosthodont. 2017; 26: 616-621
        • Jindal S.K.
        • Sherriff M.
        • Waters M.G.
        • Smay J.E.
        • Coward T.J.
        Development of a 3D printable maxillofacial silicone. Part II: optimization of moderator and thixotropic agent.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 119: 299-304
        • Jindal S.K.
        • Sherriff M.
        • Waters M.G.
        • Coward T.J.
        Development of a 3D printable maxillofacial silicone: Part I: optimization of polydimethylsiloxane chains and cross-linker concentration.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 617-622
        • Zardawi F.M.
        • Xiao K.
        • van Noort R.
        • Yates J.M.
        Anaplastology investigation of elastomer infiltration into 3D printed facial soft tissue prostheses.
        Anaplastology. 2015; 4: 3-7
        • Matsuoka A.
        • Yoshioka F.
        • Ozawa S.
        • Takebe J.
        Development of three-dimensional facial expression models using morphing methods for fabricating facial prostheses.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2018; 62: 66-72