Statement of problem
A consensus on the clinical performance in dental implants placed with different insertion torques is lacking.
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of high insertion torque compared with regular or low torques during dental implant placement in terms of implant survival rate and marginal bone loss.
Material and methods
Two independent reviewers searched electronic databases for studies published until April 2019. The population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question was “Do patients who receive implants with a high torque (equal or higher than 50 Ncm) show similar implant survival rates and marginal bone loss as compared with those who receive implants with a regular or low torque (less than 50 Ncm)?”. The meta-analysis was based on the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) and the inverse variance (IV) methods (α=.05).
The search yielded 6 articles, which included 389 patients (mean age: 55.28 years) who had received 651 dental implants (437 with high torque and 214 with low or regular torque). Most studies evaluated delayed loading, except 1 study that evaluated immediate implant loading (n=50 for each group). Low or regular insertion torque had a high failure rate (4.2%) compared with high insertion torque (1.1%), chiefly because of immediate loading. However, the meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between high- and regular- or low-torque implant placement in implant survival rate (P=.52, risk ratio [RR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-4.06) and marginal bone loss (P=.30, mean difference [MD]: 0.15, 95% CI: -0.14 to 0.44).
A high insertion torque during implant placement does not affect implant survival rate or marginal bone loss. However, further research is recommended to reassess this clinical performance.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Dent. 2018; 70: 14-22
- Reasons for failures of oral implants.J Oral Rehabil. 2014; 41: 443-476
- Relationship between primary stability and crestal bone loss of implants placed with high insertion torque: a 3-year prospective study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31: 1126-1134
- Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11: 12-25
- Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone implant interface: a review of experimental literature.J Biomed Mater Res. 1998; 43: 192-203
- Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: factors of influence and evaluation.Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013; 5: 162-167
- Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 467-471
- Clinical study on the insertion torque and wireless resonance frequency analysis in the assessment of torque capacity and stability of selftapping dental implants.J Oral Rehabil. 2009; 36: 755-761
- Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000; 2: 85-92
- Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 769-776
- Effect of insertion torque on titanium implant osseointegration: an animal experimental study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 191-196
- The relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analysed in fresh temporal bone.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991; 6: 442-447
- Implant pressure necrosis: current understanding and case report.J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 700-704
- Immediate function dental implants inserted with less than 30N·cm of torque in full-arch maxillary rehabilitations using the all-on-4 concept: retrospective study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47: 1079-1085
- Osteointegration of tissue-level implants with very low insertion torque in soft bone: a clinical study on SLA surface treatment.Implant Dent. 2018; 27: 5-9
- The influence of low insertion torque on primary stability, implant survival, and maintenance of marginal bone levels: a closed-cohort prospective study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32: 849-857
- Peak insertion torque correlated to histologically and clinically evaluated bone density.Implant Dent. 2011; 20: 182-191
- Immediate loading of single implants inserted flapless with medium or high insertion torque: a 6-month follow-up of a split-mouth randomised controlled trial.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012; 5: 333-342
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097
- Ceramic versus metal-ceramic implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 879-886
- Influence of abutment height on peri-implant marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 122: 14-21
- Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 41-51
- Longitudinal analysis on the effect of insertion torque on delayed single implants: a 3-year randomized clinical study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20: 322-332
- Impact of insertion torque and implant neck design on peri-implant bone level: a randomized split-mouth trial.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16: 668-674
- Clinical outcome and bone healing of implants placed with high insertion torque: 12-month results from a multicenter controlled cohort study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 42: 516-520
- Clinical outcome of dental implants placed with high insertion torques (up to 176 Ncm).Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 15: 227-233
- The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174
- The effect of implant placement torque on crestal bone remodeling after 1 year of loading.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018; 10: 203-209
- Post-extraction implant placement into infected versus non-infected sites: a multicenter retrospective clinical study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 833-840
- The effect of insertion torque on the clinical outcome of single implants: a randomized clinical trial.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18: 588-600
- High insertion torque and peri-Implant bone loss: is there a relationship?.J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2015; 25: 209-213
- Effect of implant macrogeometry on peri-implant healing outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23: 567-575
- Implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a controlled clinical trial.Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 6825213
Published online: September 08, 2020
© 2020 by the Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.