Abstract
This clinical report describes a ceramic complete-mouth rehabilitation with screw-retained
implant abutment crowns, optimizing esthetics by combining the properties of ceramic
materials. The abutments connected a titanium insert to a computer-aided design and
computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) monolithic zirconia framework, offering improved
esthetics and biologic response without negatively affecting the implant abutment
interface. Lithium disilicate crowns were cemented extraorally on the abutments, resulting
in a screw-retained restoration.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic DentistryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 16: 199-214
- A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 22-38
- Current status of shade selection and color matching.Quintessence Int. 1985; 16: 47-58
- Shade matching.J Esthet Dent. 1993; 5: 143-153
- A study of various factors influencing shade of bonded porcelain.J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 39: 282-284
- Color and glaze: effects of repeated firings.J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 47: 393-395
- Spectrophotometric study of five porcelain shades relative to the dimensions of color, porcelain thickness, and repeated firings.J Prosthet Dent. 1979; 42: 96-105
- Spectrometric analysis of the influence of metal substrates on the color of metal-ceramic restorations.J Dent Res. 1985; 64: 74-77
- Effect of porcelain thickness and type of metal-ceramic alloy on color.J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57: 138-145
- Shear bond strength of textured opaque porcelain.Int J Prosthodont. 1992; 5: 503-509
- Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems.J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56: 35-40
- Effect of different metal ceramic alloys on the color of opaque and dentin porcelain.J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 65: 351-356
- 9th ed. Alloys for porcelain-fused-to- metal restoration. vol 33. Quintessence, Chicago2002: 200-209
- Metal-ceramics: principles and methods.Quintessence, Chicago1985: 483-494
- Static and fatigue mechanical behavior of three dental CAD-CAM ceramics.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 59: 304-313
- Influence of microstructure and chemistry on the fracture toughness of dental ceramics.Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 603-611
- Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22: 553-560
- A clinical comparison of zirconia, metal and alumina fixed-prosthesis frameworks veneered with layered or pressed ceramic: a three-year report.J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 141: 1317-1329
- A retrospective evaluation of zirconia-fixed partial dentures in general practices: an up to 13-year study.Dent Mater. 2015; 31: 162-170
- The clinical performance of all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 196-223
- A comparative evaluation of the translucency of zirconias and lithium disilicate for monolithic restorations.J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 257-263
- Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review.Int J Prosthodont. 2010; 23: 299-309
- A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns.J Prosthodont. 2006; 15: 250-256
- A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 4-31
- All-ceramic implant abutments: esthetic indications.J Esthet Dent. 1996; 8: 255-262
- Zirconia implant abutments: a review.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16: 50-55
- An esthetic comparison of a metal ceramic crown and cast metal abutment with an all-ceramic crown and zirconia abutment: a clinical report.J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91: 215-218
- Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 285-290
- Recent developments in restorative dental ceramics.J Am Dent Assoc. 1993; 124: 72-74
- Zirconia in dentistry: part 1. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic.Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009; 4: 130-151
- Post fatigue fracture resistance of modified prefabricated zirconia implant abutments.J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 299-305
- Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 1215-1220
- Eleven-year follow-up of a prospective study of zirconia implant abutments supporting single all-ceramic crowns in anterior and premolar regions.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 2: 417-426
- Performance of zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth crowns in esthetic areas: a retrospective study up to 12-year follow-up.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 47-54
- Microgap between zirconia abutments and titanium implants.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25: 455-460
- Comparison of fracture strength and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 499-506
- Assessment of reliability of CAD-CAM tooth-colored implant custom abutments.J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 206-213
- Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD-CAM zirconia implant abutment.J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110: 389-396
- Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22: 921-927
- Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant.J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 373-377
- Performance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic Implant-supported restorations bonded to titanium inserts: a systematic review.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017; 10: 139-146
- Retentive strength of two-piece CAD-CAM zirconia implant abutments.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16: 920-925
- Effect of surface treatments on titanium alloy bonding to lithium disilicate glass-ceramics.J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 797-802
- Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120: 214-219
- Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns - a laboratory study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30: 90-98
- Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 20-27
- Fracture resistance of e.Max CAD implant superstructures cemented on lithium disilicate hybrid abutments and zirconia hybrid abutments (an in-vitro study).Egypt Dent J. 2019; 65: 97-110
- Fracture resistance of titanium-based lithium disilicate and zirconia implant restorations.J Prosthodont. 2018; 27: 644-650
- Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery.Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73: 121-133
- Accuracy of three-dimensional printed templates for guided implant placement based on matching a surface scan with CBCT.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18: 762-768
- Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73: 141-151
Article info
Publication history
Published online: November 04, 2020
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 by the Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
