Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Marginal and internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia: Framework versus complete contour design

Published:November 13, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.023

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      Translucent multicolored zirconia materials enable more esthetic complete contour zirconia fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) than conventional zirconia, which exhibits low translucency and high opacity and is monochromatic. However, how the marginal and internal fit of translucent multicolored zirconia FDPs compare with those of traditional frameworks that require veneering is unclear.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of frameworks and complete contour 3-unit FDPs fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia.

      Material and methods

      Frameworks with a thickness of 0.5 mm and complete contour FDPs with a thickness of 0.8 to 1.5 mm were manufactured by using a workflow similar to one from a zirconia master model (mandibular left second premolar-mandibular left second molar). Two polyvinyl siloxane replicas were made for each specimen to measure the marginal and internal fit. Measurement locations were mesial, lingual, buccal, and distal for each abutment. In these locations, the marginal opening (MO), chamfer area (CA), axial wall (AW), and occlusal area (OC) were measured. The data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni post hoc test (α=.05).

      Results

      Frameworks showed significantly better mean ±standard deviation fit values than complete contour 3-unit FDPs at measurement areas MO (frameworks: 112 ±22 μm, complete contour FDPs: 144 ±37 μm) (P=.013), CA (frameworks: 89 ±12 μm, complete contour FDPs: 110 ±22 μm) (P=.006), and OC (frameworks: 182 ±36 μm, complete contour FDPs: 244 ±64 μm) (P=.008). At the measurement area AW (frameworks: 47 ±7 μm, complete contour FDPs: 50 ±9 μm of each location, no significant difference was observed between frameworks and complete contour FDPs (P=.361).

      Conclusions

      Design differences in 3-unit FDPs fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia influenced the marginal and internal fit. Frameworks had smaller marginal fit than complete contour FDPs for translucent multicolored zirconia.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nistor L.
        • Grădinaru M.
        • Rîcă R.
        • Mărășescu P.
        • Stan M.
        • Manolea H.
        • et al.
        Zirconia use in dentistry – manufacturing and properties.
        Curr Health Sci J. 2019; 45: 28-35
        • Miyazaki T.
        • Nakamura T.
        • Matsumura H.
        • Ban S.
        • Kobayashi T.
        Current status of zirconia restoration.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2013; 57: 236-261
        • Gautam C.
        • Joyner J.
        • Gautam A.
        • Rao J.
        • Vajtai R.
        Zirconia based dental ceramics: structure, mechanical properties, biocompatibility and applications.
        Dalton Trans. 2016; 45: 19194-19215
        • Papadiochou S.
        • Pissiotis A.L.
        Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: a systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 545-551
        • Stawarczyk B.
        • Keul C.
        • Eichberger M.
        • Figge D.
        • Edelhoff D.
        • Lümkenmann N.
        Three generations of zirconia: from veneered to monolithic. Part Ⅰ.
        Quintessence Int. 2017; 48: 369-380
        • Jalai H.
        • Sadighpour L.
        • Miri A.
        • Shamshiri A.R.
        Comparison of marginal fit and fracture strength of CAD/CAM zirconia crown with two preparation designs.
        J Dent (Tehran). 2015; 12: 874-881
        • Sailer I.
        • Fehér A.
        • Filser F.
        • Lüthy H.
        • Gauckler L.J.
        • Schärer P.
        • et al.
        Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up.
        Quintessence Int. 2006; 37: 685-689
        • Raigrodski A.J.
        • Hillstead M.B.
        • Meng G.K.
        • Chung K.H.
        Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107: 170-177
        • Sailer I.
        • Fehér A.
        • Filser F.
        • Gauckler L.J.
        • Lüthy H.
        • Hämmerle C.H.
        Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20: 383-388
        • Gracis S.
        • Thompson V.P.
        • Ferencz J.L.
        • Silva N.R.
        • Bonfante E.A.
        A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28: 227-235
        • Hmaidouch R.
        • Weigl P.
        Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: a systematic literature review.
        Int J Oral Sci. 2013; 5: 183-190
        • Zhang Y.
        • Lee J.J.
        • Srikanth R.
        • Lawn B.R.
        Edge chipping and flexural resistance of monolithic ceramics.
        Dent Mater. 2013; 29: 1201-1208
        • Kamio S.
        • Komine F.
        • Taguchi K.
        • Iwasaki T.
        • Blatz M.B.
        • Matsumura H.
        Effects of framework design and layering material on fracture strength of implant-supported zirconia-based molar crowns.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 1407-1413
        • Tholey M.J.
        • Swain M.V.
        • Thiel N.
        Thermal gradients and residual stresses in veneered Y-TZP frameworks.
        Dent Mater. 2011; 27: 1102-1110
        • Baldissara P.
        • Llukacej A.
        • Ciocca L.
        • Valandro F.L.
        • Scotti R.
        Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104: 6-12
        • Kontonasaki E.
        • Rigos E.A.
        • Ilia C.
        • Istantos T.
        Monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge. optical properties, wear, and clinical performance.
        Dent J. 2019; 7: 90
        • Schönberger J.
        • Erdelt K.J.
        • Bäumer D.
        • Beuer F.
        Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21: 2629-2635
        • Kunii J.
        • Hotta Y.
        • Tamaki Y.
        • Ozawa A.
        • Kobayashi Y.
        • Fujishima A.
        • et al.
        Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks.
        Dent Mater J. 2007; 26: 820-826
        • McLean J.W.
        • von Fraunhofer J.A.
        The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique.
        Br Dent J. 1971; 131: 107-111
        • Christensen G.J.
        Marginal fit of gold inlay castings.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1966; 16: 297-305
        • Mitchell C.A.
        • Pintado M.R.
        • Douglas W.H.
        Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85: 575-584
        • Holmes J.R.
        • Bayne S.C.
        • Holland G.A.
        • Sulik W.D.
        Considerations in measurement of marginal fit.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62: 405-408
        • Boening K.W.
        • Wolf B.H.
        • Schmidt A.E.
        • Kästner K.
        • Walter M.H.
        Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 419-424
        • Molin M.
        • Karlsson S.
        The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical in vitro study.
        Acta Odontol Scand. 1993; 51: 201-206
        • Gonzalo E.
        • Suárez M.J.
        • Serrano B.
        • Lozano J.F.
        A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 102: 378-384
        • White S.N.
        • Yu Z.
        • Tom J.F.
        • Sangsurasak S.
        In vivo marginal adaptation of cast crowns luted with different cements.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 74: 25-32
        • White S.N.
        • Yu Z.
        • Tom J.F.
        • Sangsurasak S.
        In vivo microleakage of luting cements for cast crowns.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 333-338
        • Wilson P.R.
        Effect of increasing cement space on cementation of artificial crowns.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 560-564
        • Wu J.C.
        • Wilson P.R.
        Optimal cement space for resin luting cements.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1994; 7: 209-215